AW: How come Ada isn't more popular?

>> Ada, but they act as if they are ashamed of having anything to
>> do with it.
> I agree the IBM site is not the easiest to navigate. But really it
does
> not seem that hidden.
> www.ibm.com, click products, software by category, Software
Development,
> traditional programming languages & compilers.
> Rational Ada Developer is then on the bottom of the page (In
> alphabetical order) and still above the XC compiler.

But if you're looking for Ada, you wouldn't expect it under R, would
you?

Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG) wrote:

>
>>> Ada, but they act as if they are ashamed of having anything to
>>> do with it.
>> I agree the IBM site is not the easiest to navigate. But really it
> does
>> not seem that hidden.
>> www.ibm.com, click products, software by category, Software
> Development,
>> traditional programming languages & compilers.
>> Rational Ada Developer is then on the bottom of the page (In
>> alphabetical order) and still above the XC compiler.
>
> But if you're looking for Ada, you wouldn't expect it under R, would
> you?

More intersting: Click on "How to Buy"!

No price quoted
No online order
No selling to the general pubic

That is my impression. It might have missed something, I might be mistaken
but for answering "How come Ada isn't more popular" impression is all that
counts.

Martin
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com

AW: How come Ada isn't more popular? - ADA