| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| A while ago I posted to a thread "APL versu MatLab" , http://groups.google.com/group/comp....c5d831c9052795 , seeking more concrete examples of elegance of expression of algorithms in the 2 languages . My niece just finished "Matrix Methods" in U of CO Applied Math so now knows what "orthonormalization" means and how to do it in Matlab . I've told her is is quite elegant in APL ; less so in K . Here's the K version I did to compute my WTC design : norm { _sqrt +/ _sqr x } norm..h : " Euclidian norm , or length of a vector " normalize : { x % norm x } normalize..h : "divide vector by its length to make length 1 " ortho : { r : 1 # x : normalize' x ; i : 0 ; do[ -1 + # x ; r : r , , normalize x[ i ] - r _dot x[ i +: 1 ] _lsq r ] ; r } ortho..h : " orthonormalizes columns of a matrix . i.e / r : ortho x ; ( r _mul + r ) ~ r _lsq r / " I worry that when the time comes I want to review all my CoSy notes from ~ 1986 thru 1999 in old flat APL+PC based CoSy 2 , I won't be able to get it going . In any case , I'm not goiing to mess with it now to find my ortho from back then . Can someone post their algorithm ? I doubt if it has been changed much in newer APLs tho I know the J does some new tricks . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.