Re: Registering a .NET assembly for COM interop access from an ASP page - DOTNET
This is a discussion on Re: Registering a .NET assembly for COM interop access from an ASP page - DOTNET ; I have tried putting my DLL in C:\Windows\System32\InetSrv and the ASP page
fails with Server.CreateObject failed. If I put my DLL in
C:\Windows\System32 it works. I have tried your regasm /codebase suggestion,
but it requires a strongly named assembly and ...
-
Re: Registering a .NET assembly for COM interop access from an ASP page
I have tried putting my DLL in C:\Windows\System32\InetSrv and the ASP page
fails with Server.CreateObject failed. If I put my DLL in
C:\Windows\System32 it works. I have tried your regasm /codebase suggestion,
but it requires a strongly named assembly and my customer says they've had
problems with ASP pages calling a strongly named assembly, so I have to
decide if I want to go down that path. I don't really understand how the
codebase option is supposed to work. According to the regasm documentation
the codebase option creats a codebase entry in the registry that specifies
the file path for an assembly. How does the regasm /codebase command know
what the filepath should be. Is the the filepath of the DLL that's being
registered?
Zoe
""Peter Huang" [MSFT]" <v-phuang@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:m7glg8eLGHA.128@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi Zoe,
>
> I am sorry I did not make it more clear.
> The bin directory is meanful for the ASP.NET application.
> But for ASP, it has a different mechanism. For an ASP page, it is running
> at inetinfo.exe(The IIS process), or the dllhost.exe. This depends on how
> you config your ASP application. If you config the Application protection
> as Low, it will run in the IIS process(inetinfo.exe).
> The inetinfo.exe is under the dir below.
> c:\WINDOWS\system32\inetsrv
> The dllhost.exe is under the dir below.
> c:\WINDOWS\system32\inetsrv
>
>
> When we call COM from ASP page, it is going the way of legacy win32
> application.
> In a Win32 Process, there will be a Working dir when we create a process.
>
> lpCurrentDirectory
> [in] Pointer to a null-terminated string that specifies the full path to
> the current directory for the process. The string can also specify a UNC
> path.
> If this parameter is NULL, the new process will have the same current
> drive
> and directory as the calling process. (This feature is provided primarily
> for shells that need to start an application and specify its initial drive
> and working directory.)
> CreateProcess
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...us/dllproc/bas
> e/createprocess.asp
>
> So the IIS process or dllhost will check the lpCurrentDirectory in their
> environment block which is a internal structure for a Process.
> Because the IIS process or dllhost's default lpCurrentDirectory is
> %systemroot%\system32, so it will try to find the COM dll(the .NET
> assembly
> has been registered as a legacy COM) in the dir above.
> That is why when you put the dll under the %systemroot%\system32, it will
> work.
> But this is not recommend, because that dir is mainly used for stored
> system dll, it is hard to maintain if you had put many your own dll in
> that
> dir.
>
> BTW: have you tried my suggestion, that use regasm /codebase to register
> the .NET dll as COM?
> If you still have any concern, please feel free to post here.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Peter Huang
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
>
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>
-
Re: Registering a .NET assembly for COM interop access from an ASP page
Hi Zoe,
Yes, in this scenario, we need to put the Assembly into the
C:\Windows\System32 because it is the directory which is the working
directory for the IIS process.
The working directory is the place where the process will check for the dll.
If we call regasm with /codebase, the full path will be registered in the
registry. If we did not specifed the /codebase, only the file name will be
entered into registry.
Best regards,
Peter Huang
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
-
Re: Registering a .NET assembly for COM interop access from an ASP page
Peter,
I realized I was misreading the response from regasm.exe when I tried to
register my unsigned assembly with the /codebase option. I was distracted by
the long warning: "RegAsm : warning RA0000 : Registering an unsigned
assembly with /codebase can cause your assembly to interfere with other
applications that may be installed on the same computer. The /codebase
switch is intended to be used only with signed assemblies. Please give your
assembly a strong name and re-register it." And I missed the "Types
registered successfully" bit that followed.
I'm now using /codebase and things are working well. Thank you for all your
help.
Zoe
""Peter Huang" [MSFT]" <v-phuang@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BYmPMPDOGHA.128@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
> Hi Zoe,
>
> Yes, in this scenario, we need to put the Assembly into the
> C:\Windows\System32 because it is the directory which is the working
> directory for the IIS process.
> The working directory is the place where the process will check for the
> dll.
>
> If we call regasm with /codebase, the full path will be registered in the
> registry. If we did not specifed the /codebase, only the file name will be
> entered into registry.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Peter Huang
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
>
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>
-
Re: Registering a .NET assembly for COM interop access from an ASP page
Hi Zoe,
You are welcomed!
Best regards,
Peter Huang
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Similar Threads
-
By Application Development in forum DOTNET
Replies: 2
Last Post: 07-31-2007, 03:57 AM
-
By Application Development in forum DOTNET
Replies: 5
Last Post: 04-23-2006, 09:34 PM
-
By Application Development in forum DOTNET
Replies: 1
Last Post: 08-18-2005, 12:25 PM
-
By Application Development in forum DOTNET
Replies: 1
Last Post: 07-19-2004, 08:54 PM
-
By Application Development in forum DOTNET
Replies: 0
Last Post: 07-03-2003, 12:02 PM