SOAP fault carried over HTTP 200 or HTTP 500 ? - DOTNET
This is a discussion on SOAP fault carried over HTTP 200 or HTTP 500 ? - DOTNET ; Hi,
Some of my webservice peers return SOAP faults using a
"HTTP 200 OK" reply and others use a
"HTTP 500 Internal Server Error" instead. I was wondering
if there is some kind of standard for SOAP over HTTP
(or, ...
-
SOAP fault carried over HTTP 200 or HTTP 500 ?
Hi,
Some of my webservice peers return SOAP faults using a
"HTTP 200 OK" reply and others use a
"HTTP 500 Internal Server Error" instead. I was wondering
if there is some kind of standard for SOAP over HTTP
(or, more specifically where I can find such a beast)
that regulates these things?
And, which one is correct? Using HTTP 200 OK or
HTTP 500 Internal Server Error?
regards,
martin
-
RE: SOAP fault carried over HTTP 200 or HTTP 500 ?
HI
According to WS-I BP 1.1 (www.ws-i.org), indicating a SOAP fault using the
response code 500 Internal Server error is not mandatory. It recommends the
checking of the SOAP:Fault tag to determine whehter it is a SOAP:Fault or not.
"martin" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of my webservice peers return SOAP faults using a
> "HTTP 200 OK" reply and others use a
> "HTTP 500 Internal Server Error" instead. I was wondering
> if there is some kind of standard for SOAP over HTTP
> (or, more specifically where I can find such a beast)
> that regulates these things?
>
> And, which one is correct? Using HTTP 200 OK or
> HTTP 500 Internal Server Error?
>
>
> regards,
> martin
Similar Threads
-
By Application Development in forum DOTNET
Replies: 7
Last Post: 09-12-2006, 11:30 AM
-
By Application Development in forum XML SOAP
Replies: 0
Last Post: 08-21-2006, 11:16 PM
-
By Application Development in forum DOTNET
Replies: 1
Last Post: 05-25-2006, 03:37 AM
-
By Application Development in forum XML SOAP
Replies: 0
Last Post: 07-09-2005, 04:42 AM
-
By Application Development in forum XML SOAP
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-15-2005, 08:40 AM