Handling System._ComObject -- using CCW - DOTNET

This is a discussion on Handling System._ComObject -- using CCW - DOTNET ; Hi I am calling .NET components from my Classical ASPs. For this I strong named my assemblies, then registered them in the resistry ( using RegAsm), and put them in GAC (using GacUtil) . Everything worked fine and my ASPs ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Handling System._ComObject -- using CCW

  1. Default Handling System._ComObject -- using CCW

    Hi

    I am calling .NET components from my Classical ASPs.
    For this I strong named my assemblies, then registered them in the resistry
    ( using RegAsm), and put them in GAC (using GacUtil) .
    Everything worked fine and my ASPs were able to call and use them.

    The problem comes when my ASP code assigns an ASP object variable to a
    property of a class in the assembly like:
    oDotNetObject("Name") = Request("Name")
    ( where oDotNetObject is a class in my registered assembly )

    The COM Callable Wrapper sends it as System._ComObject to .NET Runtime which
    then throws exception as nothing is allowed on System._ComObject. On the
    other hand, passing it as Variant solves the problem.
    Dim varName = Request("Name")
    oDotNetObject("Name") = varName

    But this would require a significant change in my ASP pages. I want to
    modify only my .NET components. Is there any way I can use this
    System._ComObject in my managed code or any way I can make CCW to handle it.
    I was trying to use System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal namespace to use
    the System._ComObject I have not been able to do it.

    Thanks in anticipation
    Varun



  2. Default Re: Handling System._ComObject -- using CCW

    Thanks Oisin

    But here my problem is that I am working on a huge application and I cant
    change this usage in ASP files.
    So I have to find a solution in .Net component -- as you said -- i will have
    to marshal a com object
    Any ideas about that!

    Thanks
    Varun

    "Oisin Grehan" <oising@nospam.iol.ie.> wrote in message
    news:OFHJDiJRDHA.3664@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    > By assigning Request("Name") to the property, you are using a bad habit

    most
    > of us have by relying on default properties. Take a look at this:
    >
    > <%
    > Dim strName
    > strName = Request("Name")
    > %>
    >
    > The ASP engine will assigning the default property (which happens to be
    > "Item") to the variable and everything will be fine. However, when you

    use:
    >
    > oDotNetObject("Name") = Request("Name")
    >
    > You are relying on the DotNet class to retrieve the default property from
    > the COM object "Request". If you use:
    >
    > oDotNetObject("Name") = Request("Name").Item
    >
    > Everything should be mostl likely be fine as you are not longer

    marshalling
    > a COM object, but rather a simple string.
    >
    > Hope this helps,
    >
    > - Oisin
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "Varun Singal" <varun.singal@induslogic.com> wrote in message
    > news:u$7ErPJRDHA.1624@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    > > Hi
    > >
    > > I am calling .NET components from my Classical ASPs.
    > > For this I strong named my assemblies, then registered them in the

    > resistry
    > > ( using RegAsm), and put them in GAC (using GacUtil) .
    > > Everything worked fine and my ASPs were able to call and use them.
    > >
    > > The problem comes when my ASP code assigns an ASP object variable to a
    > > property of a class in the assembly like:
    > > oDotNetObject("Name") = Request("Name")
    > > ( where oDotNetObject is a class in my registered assembly )
    > >
    > > The COM Callable Wrapper sends it as System._ComObject to .NET Runtime

    > which
    > > then throws exception as nothing is allowed on System._ComObject. On the
    > > other hand, passing it as Variant solves the problem.
    > > Dim varName = Request("Name")
    > > oDotNetObject("Name") = varName
    > >
    > > But this would require a significant change in my ASP pages. I want to
    > > modify only my .NET components. Is there any way I can use this
    > > System._ComObject in my managed code or any way I can make CCW to handle

    > it.
    > > I was trying to use System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal namespace to

    > use
    > > the System._ComObject I have not been able to do it.
    > >
    > > Thanks in anticipation
    > > Varun
    > >
    > >

    >
    >




  3. Default Re: Handling System._ComObject -- using CCW

    Varun, surely it is more work to facilitate this than to spend a while with
    global find/replace with regex on those ASP files? Marshalling COM objects
    instead of strings is hugely inefficient, incredibly lazy as well as just
    plain wrong. But, if you really are a masochist (or an assembly
    programmer -- same thing), keep reading:

    First of all, I hope you're comfortable with COM interop, IDL, type
    libraries and other such nasties. I'm not an interop specialist nor a COM
    guru by any means, so I can only try to direct you. Right, since you're
    passing in a System._ComObject object, I believe you'll need to use the
    MarshalAs attribute to tell .NET that you're expecting
    UnmanagedType.IDispatch. "Request" is an IDispatch object. If we inspect the
    IDL with OleView (tool included with VS) by pointing it at the ASP type
    library available at C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
    Studio\Common\IDE\IDE98\asp.tlb assuming you've got Vstudio 6.0 installed in
    the default location, you can see the following info (trimmed down for
    brevity) for IRequest:

    [odl, uuid(D97A6DA0-A861-11CF-93AE-00A0C90C2BD8), hidden, dual,
    oleautomation]
    interface IRequest : IDispatch {
    [id(00000000), propget]
    HRESULT Item([in] BSTR bstrVar, [out, retval] IDispatch** ppObjReturn);

    HRESULT QueryString([out, retval] IRequestDictionary** ppDictReturn);
    HRESULT Form([out, retval] IRequestDictionary** ppDictReturn);
    };

    You'll see that Item is the default property (IDL id of 0), it returns an
    IDispatch interface, most likely this one in your case:

    [odl, uuid(D97A6DA0-A85F-11DF-83AE-00A0C90C2BD8), helpstring("Dictionary for
    Request collections"), hidden, dual, oleautomation]
    interface IRequestDictionary : IDispatch {
    [id(00000000), propget]
    HRESULT Item([in, optional] VARIANT Var, [out, retval] VARIANT*
    pVariantReturn);
    };

    Again, you can see the default property for the IRequestDictionary is Item
    also, which returns a variant. This is the variant you need to get your
    grubby hands on. All the information you'll need to imbibe and understand is
    on MSDN. A good place to start is to look up the MarshalAs attribute and
    pay attention to the UnmanagedType enumeration. There's some good example
    code there.

    Now, if this hasn't put you off, you plainly have access to the ASP
    source -- is it really that huge a task to change it? Open all ASP pages in
    VS.NET, use Find/Replace with Regular Expressions. Replace .*
    \=\s?Request\("{.*}\"\) with = Request("\1").Item. Bingo, assuming that
    Regex expression out of my head is correct. If you have the time, sit back
    and learn COM interop. If that looks like too steep a hill to climb, change
    the ASP pages, or better yet, learn Regular Expressions. It'll be the best
    hour you've spend in front of the computer today and it will pay you back
    many times over.

    Hope this helps,

    - Oisin







    "Varun Singal" <varun.singal@induslogic.com> wrote in message
    news:eNzcCRKRDHA.3768@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    > Thanks Oisin
    >
    > But here my problem is that I am working on a huge application and I cant
    > change this usage in ASP files.
    > So I have to find a solution in .Net component -- as you said -- i will

    have
    > to marshal a com object
    > Any ideas about that!
    >
    > Thanks
    > Varun
    >
    > "Oisin Grehan" <oising@nospam.iol.ie.> wrote in message
    > news:OFHJDiJRDHA.3664@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    > > By assigning Request("Name") to the property, you are using a bad habit

    > most
    > > of us have by relying on default properties. Take a look at this:
    > >
    > > <%
    > > Dim strName
    > > strName = Request("Name")
    > > %>
    > >
    > > The ASP engine will assigning the default property (which happens to be
    > > "Item") to the variable and everything will be fine. However, when you

    > use:
    > >
    > > oDotNetObject("Name") = Request("Name")
    > >
    > > You are relying on the DotNet class to retrieve the default property

    from
    > > the COM object "Request". If you use:
    > >
    > > oDotNetObject("Name") = Request("Name").Item
    > >
    > > Everything should be mostl likely be fine as you are not longer

    > marshalling
    > > a COM object, but rather a simple string.
    > >
    > > Hope this helps,
    > >
    > > - Oisin
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > "Varun Singal" <varun.singal@induslogic.com> wrote in message
    > > news:u$7ErPJRDHA.1624@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    > > > Hi
    > > >
    > > > I am calling .NET components from my Classical ASPs.
    > > > For this I strong named my assemblies, then registered them in the

    > > resistry
    > > > ( using RegAsm), and put them in GAC (using GacUtil) .
    > > > Everything worked fine and my ASPs were able to call and use them.
    > > >
    > > > The problem comes when my ASP code assigns an ASP object variable to a
    > > > property of a class in the assembly like:
    > > > oDotNetObject("Name") = Request("Name")
    > > > ( where oDotNetObject is a class in my registered assembly )
    > > >
    > > > The COM Callable Wrapper sends it as System._ComObject to .NET Runtime

    > > which
    > > > then throws exception as nothing is allowed on System._ComObject. On

    the
    > > > other hand, passing it as Variant solves the problem.
    > > > Dim varName = Request("Name")
    > > > oDotNetObject("Name") = varName
    > > >
    > > > But this would require a significant change in my ASP pages. I want to
    > > > modify only my .NET components. Is there any way I can use this
    > > > System._ComObject in my managed code or any way I can make CCW to

    handle
    > > it.
    > > > I was trying to use System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal namespace

    to
    > > use
    > > > the System._ComObject I have not been able to do it.
    > > >
    > > > Thanks in anticipation
    > > > Varun
    > > >
    > > >

    > >
    > >

    >
    >




+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. handling perl string containing '@' and '$' with system function
    By Application Development in forum Perl
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-28-2007, 09:32 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-26-2007, 05:30 PM
  3. Mercury Mail Transport System IMAP Data Handling Buffer Overflow
    By Application Development in forum Pegasus
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-13-2007, 08:38 AM
  4. System._Comobject Exception (E_NOINTERFACE)
    By Application Development in forum DOTNET
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 05:12 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-22-2005, 01:11 AM