Re: Vim vs. Vi clonesThis is a discussion on Re: Vim vs. Vi clones within the Editors forums in Theory and Concepts category; On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:36:02 -0500, Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide @ sacrideo.us> wrote: >Hello all, > >I'm just interested in taking a little casual survey of Vi* users. I >personally use the nex/nvi replacesments for ex/vi found in OpenBSD. >I use them because they are in the base, installed by default, and do >a good job of what I want, without requiring additional packages. > >How about you? For you, why are you using your chosen vi clone or Vim? >Why choose it over some of the other variants out there? > > Aaron Hsu gvimportable on win32 (xp) ... | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
08-25-2008, 09:55 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: Vim vs. Vi clones On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:36:02 -0500, Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> wrote: >Hello all, > >I'm just interested in taking a little casual survey of Vi* users. I >personally use the nex/nvi replacesments for ex/vi found in OpenBSD. >I use them because they are in the base, installed by default, and do >a good job of what I want, without requiring additional packages. > >How about you? For you, why are you using your chosen vi clone or Vim? >Why choose it over some of the other variants out there? > > Aaron Hsu gvimportable on win32 (xp) because a few years ago I started customizing it to suit my needs, and now it's gotten so much of a habit using all those shortcuts, that I cannot (and will not :-) work with anything else it's portable, and registry free, so nobody (admins and the like) can complain it leaves junk on their systems marin  |
 |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.
