| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi Using Photoshop 7 I have a photo of a person sitting near a wall They are casting a shadow on the wall How would I go about removing the shadow? -- Martin ©¿©¬ |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Aug 26, 1:37 pm, Martin ©¿©¬ @nohere.net wrote: > Hi > Using Photoshop 7 > I have a photo of a person sitting near a wall > They are casting a shadow on the wall > How would I go about removing the shadow? > -- > Martin > ©¿©¬ Hi Martin, Sometimes it is possible. I have done it and made it look good but it took some time and I got lucky with the information surrounding the relfections. If you post a link to an image you will get a more informed opinion - same goes for the shadow question. Good luck, Ron |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| <Martin ©¿©¬ @nohere.net> wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Using Photoshop 7 > I have a photo of a person sitting near a wall > They are casting a shadow on the wall > How would I go about removing the shadow? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Using Photoshop Elements, I select along any critical edges, and then clone in samples from other parts of the wall. If it's a plain wall, it's easy. Be careful to choose from a part of the wall that has the same lighting. If it's a brick wall, or wallpaper, you also have to line up the pattern. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:29:01 GMT, "Leo Lichtman" <l.lichtman@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > ><Martin ©¿©¬ @nohere.net> wrote: >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Using Photoshop 7 >> I have a photo of a person sitting near a wall >> They are casting a shadow on the wall >> How would I go about removing the shadow? >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Using Photoshop Elements, I select along any critical edges, and then clone >in samples from other parts of the wall. If it's a plain wall, it's easy. >Be careful to choose from a part of the wall that has the same lighting. If >it's a brick wall, or wallpaper, you also have to line up the pattern. Thank you Leo for both your replies As the photo is for a disabled parking Orange badge, I think it will be easier to take the photo again paying particular attention to the possible problems -- Regards Martin ©¿©¬ |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Martin ©¿©¬ @nohere.net wrote: >> Using Photoshop 7 >>> I have a photo of a person sitting near a wall >>> They are casting a shadow on the wall >>> How would I go about removing the shadow? > As the photo is for a disabled parking Orange badge, I think it will > be easier to take the photo again paying particular attention to the > possible problems If you take the photo with and without the person there, you can combine the images to eliminate the shadow. Andrew |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Andrew Morton" <akm@in-press.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message news:6hkosuFmm8svU1@mid.individual.net... > Martin ©¿©¬ @nohere.net wrote: >>> Using Photoshop 7 >>>> I have a photo of a person sitting near a wall >>>> They are casting a shadow on the wall >>>> How would I go about removing the shadow? > >> As the photo is for a disabled parking Orange badge, I think it will >> be easier to take the photo again paying particular attention to the >> possible problems > > If you take the photo with and without the person there, you can combine > the images to eliminate the shadow. > > Andrew make the person stand away from the wall make sure the light above them not direct at them if you have no strobe or umbrella or scrim>>> point flash up ward at ceiling and bounce it, also make a diffuser by a piece of white cloth rubber band around the flash or shoot through a white sheet or shower curtain with an off-camera flash or have subject sit in shade but with DAY light from behind your back on them- this is soft even flat light it is always easier to make a photo as good as possible and avoid PS excessive corrections poor photos can be improved with PS but will not look as well as a shot taken correctly in camera |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "KatWoman" wrote: (clip) it is always easier to make a photo as good as possible and avoid PS > excessive corrections > poor photos can be improved with PS but will not look as well as a shot > taken correctly in camera ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A camera is a "machine," with physical and optical limitations. I almost always do some digital work on my images to accomplish results that were not fully realized in the original image. I think your statement goes way too far. Some failures in the original exposure are very difficult (virtually impossible) to Photoshop away--for example, severe underexposure, camera movement, poor focus, poorly chosen angle of view, inappropriate focal length. OTOH, things like contrast, brightness, background blur are easily manipulated. Even facial expression can often be improved. The more you work on pictures, the easier it becomes to recognize small ways to make worthwhile changes, I LOVE to play with local contrast in order to help the viewer see what I want him/her to see. I sometimes move objects in a picture to improve composition. One of my best examples was a picture made by combining parts from several exposures of dancers, taken in a crowded room, where the ideal photograph would have simply been impossible. The result was a picture that represented the "reality" I had in my mind's eye. I think this is a valid use of Photoshop. I frequently also like to go through a photo made with flash, and remove the harsh shadows cast by the single light source. You may be right, that an umbrella, or a shower curtain, or a diffuse reflector would have produced better lighting, but those dancers won't stand still for that. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Martin ©¿©¬ @nohere.net wrote: > Hi > Using Photoshop 7 > I have a photo of a person sitting near a wall > They are casting a shadow on the wall > How would I go about removing the shadow? Same thing, this is pretty basic and I will give you the advanced technique. Also, I don't remember Photoshop 7 has Masking option or not (I think it does but I don't have good memory). 1. Make a duplicate of the original 2. Using Level to adjust the SHADOW layer to match the normal layer. DO NOT worry about the bright part cuz you only need to take care of the shadowed part 3. Click on the [o] (Quick Mask) then using BRUSH Tool to bring up the repaired area and you have it. If you don't know how to use Mask Tool (not creating Mask Image) then you may need to Google for some vidio tutorial. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Leo Lichtman" <l.lichtman@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:Pfktk.17106$Mh5.15926@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > > "KatWoman" wrote: (clip) it is always easier to make a photo as good as > possible and avoid PS >> excessive corrections >> poor photos can be improved with PS but will not look as well as a shot >> taken correctly in camera > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > A camera is a "machine," with physical and optical limitations. I almost > always do some digital work on my images to accomplish results that were > not fully realized in the original image. I think your statement goes way > too far. Some failures in the original exposure are very difficult > (virtually impossible) to Photoshop away--for example, severe > underexposure, camera movement, poor focus, poorly chosen angle of view, > inappropriate focal length. OTOH, things like contrast, brightness, > background blur are easily manipulated. Even facial expression can often > be improved. The more you work on pictures, the easier it becomes to > recognize small ways to make worthwhile changes, I LOVE to play with > local contrast in order to help the viewer see what I want him/her to see. > I sometimes move objects in a picture to improve composition. > > One of my best examples was a picture made by combining parts from several > exposures of dancers, taken in a crowded room, where the ideal photograph > would have simply been impossible. The result was a picture that > represented the "reality" I had in my mind's eye. I think this is a valid > use of Photoshop. I frequently also like to go through a photo made with > flash, and remove the harsh shadows cast by the single light source. > > You may be right, that an umbrella, or a shower curtain, or a diffuse I did not say avoid PS entirely ' read what I typed avoid EXCESSIVE PS to correct what should be in the original IE good lighting of course I use PS to tweak most images from good to fantastic that is my job crap to fantastic is harder this man is asking how to fix POORLY LIT PHOTOS I advise him to reshoot over fixing crap I may be right?? I am right |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "KatWoman" (clip) this man is asking how to fix POORLY LIT PHOTOS > I advise him to reshoot over fixing crap (clip) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The man asked how to remove an unwanted shadow from a wall. It is a stretch to conclude from that that it is a poorly lit photo. It is a HUGE stretch to call it crap. It's for an ID badge. Why not just answer the OP's question? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.