RF Modulator and Cable Modem : Home Automation
This is a discussion on RF Modulator and Cable Modem within the Home Automation forums in Other Technologies category; Hi I am wanting to wire a cam via RF modulator (Channel Vision CVT1) at home. Does anyone know if a notch filter is going to impact my Modem? Goal - 1 cam 1 channel to 3 TV's....
| Home Automation Home Automation basics, design, equipment and touch screen displays etc. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| home. Does anyone know if a notch filter is going to impact my Modem? Goal - 1 cam 1 channel to 3 TV's. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <9-6dnRVT28IDXbDYnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@adelphia.com>, "JTrusner" <jtrusner@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi I am wanting to wire a cam via RF modulator (Channel Vision CVT1) at > home. Does anyone know if a notch filter is going to impact my Modem? Goal - > 1 cam 1 channel to 3 TV's. The CM downstream probably uses one of the highest channels, and the upstream is below channel 2 by a bit. If you pick a notch somewhere between channel 6 and channel 30 or so, probably not a problem. Here's the best setup: There should be a splitter in the incoming cable, with one side feeding your TV and the other, the CM. Do not tamper with the cable coming from the street into that splitter. Add your notch filter to the side that feeds the TV, and there's not much chance at all of a problem. Isaac |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for the quick response. My CM is using 573Mhz(downstream channel 82) and 32Mhz (upstream - below channel 2). The line from the street feeds into a 4-way splitter of which 1 line goes to the CM. Where would the notch go in this configuration? "isw" <isw@witzend.com> wrote in message news:isw-2A91D5.21485011102006@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > In article <9-6dnRVT28IDXbDYnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@adelphia.com>, > "JTrusner" <jtrusner@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi I am wanting to wire a cam via RF modulator (Channel Vision CVT1) at >> home. Does anyone know if a notch filter is going to impact my Modem? >> Goal - >> 1 cam 1 channel to 3 TV's. > > The CM downstream probably uses one of the highest channels, and the > upstream is below channel 2 by a bit. If you pick a notch somewhere > between channel 6 and channel 30 or so, probably not a problem. > > Here's the best setup: There should be a splitter in the incoming cable, > with one side feeding your TV and the other, the CM. Do not tamper with > the cable coming from the street into that splitter. Add your notch > filter to the side that feeds the TV, and there's not much chance at all > of a problem. > > Isaac |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| One idea: replace that 4-way splitter w/ a 2-way splitter. Use one branch for the CM, and send the other branch into the notch and then split that resulting signal w/ the 4-way splitter -- those go to the TVs. That is basically the setup I use and it works well. Kurt "JTrusner" <jtrusner@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:fKWdnQIRW-S-xbPYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@adelphia.com... > Thanks for the quick response. My CM is using 573Mhz(downstream channel > 82) and 32Mhz (upstream - below channel 2). The line from the street feeds > into a 4-way splitter of which 1 line goes to the CM. Where would the > notch go in this configuration? > > "isw" <isw@witzend.com> wrote in message > news:isw-2A91D5.21485011102006@comcast.dca.giganews.com... >> In article <9-6dnRVT28IDXbDYnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@adelphia.com>, >> "JTrusner" <jtrusner@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi I am wanting to wire a cam via RF modulator (Channel Vision CVT1) at >>> home. Does anyone know if a notch filter is going to impact my Modem? >>> Goal - >>> 1 cam 1 channel to 3 TV's. >> >> The CM downstream probably uses one of the highest channels, and the >> upstream is below channel 2 by a bit. If you pick a notch somewhere >> between channel 6 and channel 30 or so, probably not a problem. >> >> Here's the best setup: There should be a splitter in the incoming cable, >> with one side feeding your TV and the other, the CM. Do not tamper with >> the cable coming from the street into that splitter. Add your notch >> filter to the side that feeds the TV, and there's not much chance at all >> of a problem. >> >> Isaac > > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <fKWdnQIRW-S-xbPYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@adelphia.com>, "JTrusner" <jtrusner@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. My CM is using 573Mhz(downstream channel 82) > and 32Mhz (upstream - below channel 2). The line from the street feeds into > a 4-way splitter of which 1 line goes to the CM. Where would the notch go in > this configuration? In any splitter output *except* the one that feeds the CM. The possible problem is that the notch filter may not have extended low frequency response, and so may not be able to pass the CM upstream signal. For "pure" TV service, there's no need for splitters etc. to have response below channel 2, and many, especially older ones, do not. Isaac |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In article <_YsXg.990$pa1.478@news.cpqcorp.net>, "Kurt Delaney" <kurt_dot_delaney@rm_this_hp.com> wrote: > One idea: replace that 4-way splitter w/ a 2-way splitter. Use one branch > for the CM, and send the other branch into the notch and then split that > resulting signal w/ the 4-way splitter -- those go to the TVs. That is > basically the setup I use and it works well. That'll work *provided* the cable signals at your house are considerably above the minimum level. A four-way splitter already eats up a lot of signal, and a four behind a two may have problems. You can try it, and if it works, fine, but be aware that lots of things can affect the level of the signal coming down the street, so on a very hot (or cold) day, or at any other random time, things might go wonky. ****og signals may just get a bit noisy, but if a digital carrier drops below threshold, nada. Isaac |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I can confirm that the 4 behind a 2 does not work. I tried this before and my CM would not work. I guess my solution is going to be an amplified system. I have 2 primary concerns. 1) The cam signal stays in the house 2) CM keeps working. Any recommendations on products or configuration. "isw" <isw@witzend.com> wrote in message news:isw-EF4FD3.21103112102006@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > In article <_YsXg.990$pa1.478@news.cpqcorp.net>, > "Kurt Delaney" <kurt_dot_delaney@rm_this_hp.com> wrote: > >> One idea: replace that 4-way splitter w/ a 2-way splitter. Use one >> branch >> for the CM, and send the other branch into the notch and then split that >> resulting signal w/ the 4-way splitter -- those go to the TVs. That is >> basically the setup I use and it works well. > > That'll work *provided* the cable signals at your house are considerably > above the minimum level. A four-way splitter already eats up a lot of > signal, and a four behind a two may have problems. > > You can try it, and if it works, fine, but be aware that lots of things > can affect the level of the signal coming down the street, so on a very > hot (or cold) day, or at any other random time, things might go wonky. > ****og signals may just get a bit noisy, but if a digital carrier drops > below threshold, nada. > > Isaac |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Are there differences between the 185095-02 cable and the185095c-02 cable? | usenet | labview | 0 | 11-30-2007 01:40 PM |
| using QPSK modulator | usenet | DSP | 1 | 07-06-2007 06:02 PM |
| Cable Modem not allowing computer to shut down | usenet | Hardware | 2 | 08-02-2004 05:18 PM |
| cable modem w/ multiple computers | usenet | Hardware | 2 | 07-16-2004 02:24 AM |
| Re: Mercury on a cable modem and network? | usenet | Pegasus | 0 | 06-15-2004 11:09 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.



