Facade Stateless session ejb Transaction attribute - Java
This is a discussion on Facade Stateless session ejb Transaction attribute - Java ; Hi,
I have an Stateless session ejb acting as a facade to the
business classes. The EJB method just invokes appropriate business
class/methods based on the task id passed.
I wonder what should be the Transaction Attribute to be set
...
-
Facade Stateless session ejb Transaction attribute
Hi,
I have an Stateless session ejb acting as a facade to the
business classes. The EJB method just invokes appropriate business
class/methods based on the task id passed.
I wonder what should be the Transaction Attribute to be set
for that EJB.
By default Weblogic(My application server) uses 'Supports' and so far
I donot have any issue with it.
Just wondering if 'Supports' as the Transaction attribute
is correct in this scenario.
Any help is appreriated.
Thanks
Lourduraj
-
Re: Facade Stateless session ejb Transaction attribute
In article <1185912767.221220.247810@b79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, lourduraj.s wrote:
>Hi,
> I have an Stateless session ejb acting as a facade to the
>business classes. The EJB method just invokes appropriate business
>class/methods based on the task id passed.
>
> I wonder what should be the Transaction Attribute to be set
>for that EJB.
>By default Weblogic(My application server) uses 'Supports' and so far
>I donot have any issue with it.
>
> Just wondering if 'Supports' as the Transaction attribute
>is correct in this scenario.
>
> Any help is appreriated.
>
>Thanks
>Lourduraj
>
I would think required. Is the facade's caller in a transaction?
Eric
Similar Threads
-
By Application Development in forum Java
Replies: 2
Last Post: 12-02-2005, 04:00 PM
-
By Application Development in forum Java
Replies: 3
Last Post: 04-12-2005, 04:57 PM
-
By Application Development in forum DOTNET
Replies: 4
Last Post: 03-05-2004, 06:04 AM
-
By Application Development in forum Java
Replies: 3
Last Post: 01-20-2004, 08:16 AM
-
By Application Development in forum Java
Replies: 1
Last Post: 12-11-2003, 02:33 PM