Re: Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Protocol 24

Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
posting?

This is a java forum. If I am interested in religious doctrine, I
would subscribe to that forum!

On Aug 20, 7:00*pm, Blanche <we...@monster.mil> wrote:
> [Lucifer, satan, 666, Illuminati, Freemasons, NWO, Skull and Bones, Zionism]
>
> Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion
>
> Protocol Number 24 : Qualities Of The Ruler
>
> PROTOCOL NUMBER TWENTY-FOUR
>
> 1. I pass now to the method of confirming the dynastic roots
> of King David to the last strata of the earth.
>
> 2. This confirmation will first and foremost be included in
> that which to this day has rested the force of conservatism
> by our learned elders of the conduct of the affairs of the
> world, in the directing of the education of thought of all
> humanity.
>
> 3. Certain members of the seed of David will prepare the
> kings and their heirs, selecting not by right of heritage
> but by eminent capacities, inducting them into the most
> secret mysteries of the political, into schemes of
> government, but providing always that none may come to
> knowledge of the secrets. The object of this mode of action
> is that all may know that government cannot be entrusted to
> those who have not been inducted into the secret places of
> its art ....
>
> 4. To these persons only will be taught the practical
> application of the aforenamed plans by comparison of the
> experiences of many centuries, all the observations on the
> politico-economic moves and social sciences - in a word, all
> the spirit of laws which have been unshakably established by
> nature herself for the regulation of the relations of
> humanity.
>
> 5. Direct heirs will often be set aside from ascending the
> throne if in their time of training they exhibit frivolity,
> softness and other qualities that are the ruin of authority,
> which render them incapable of governing and in themselves
> dangerous for kingly office.
>
> 6. Only those who are unconditionally capable for firm, even
> if it be to cruelty, direct rule will receive the reins of
> rule from our learned elders.
>
> 7. In case of falling sick with weakness of will or other
> form of incapacity. kings must by law hand over the reins of
> rule to new and capable hands.
>
> 8. The king's plan of action for the current moment, and all
> the more so for the future, will be unknown, even to those
> who are called his closest counselors.
>
> Quote:
>
> [Lucifer, satan, 666, Illuminati, Freemasons, NWO, Skull and Bones, Zionism]
>
> Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion
>
> Protocol Number 24 : Qualities Of The Ruler
>
> PROTOCOL NUMBER TWENTY-FOUR
>
> KING OF THE JEWS:
>
> 9. Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him
> will know what is coming.
>
> 10. In the person of the king who with unbending will is
> master of himself and of humanity all will discern as it
> were fate with its mysterious ways. None will know what the
> king wishes to attain by his dispositions, and therefore
> none will dare to stand across an unknown path.
>
> 11. It is understood that the brain reservoir of the king
> must correspond in capacity to the plan of government it has
> to contain. It is for this reason that he will ascend the
> throne not otherwise than after examination of his mind by
> the aforesaid learned elders.
>
> 12. That the people may know and love their king, it is
> indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with
> his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two
> forces which are now divided one from another by us by the
> terror.
>
> 13. This terror was indispensable for us till the time comes
> for both these forces separately to fall under our
> influence.
>
> 14. The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his
> passions, and especially of sensuality: on no side of his
> character must he give brute instincts power over his mind.
> Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes the capacities
> of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts
> to the worst and most brutal side of human activity.
>
> 15. The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord
> of all the world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to
> his people all personal inclinations.
>
> 16. Our supreme lord must be of an exemplary irreproachable.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [NWO, New World Order, Lucifer, Satan, 666, Illuminati, Zionism,
> fascism, totalitarian, dictator]
>
> In the 1844 political novel Coningsby by Benjamin Disraeli,
> the British Prime Minister, a character known as Sidonia
> (which was based on Lord Rothschild, whose family he had become
> close friends with in the early 1840's) says:
>
> "That mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany
> and which will be in fact a greater and a second Reformation, and of
> which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing
> under the auspices of the Jews, who almost monopolize the professorial
> chairs of Germany...the world is governed by very different personages
> from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

In article
<de8f9889-d846-4788-8467-36c04c26a03b@v57g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
rajeevnair32@gmail.com wrote:

> On Aug 20, 7:00*pm, Blanche <we...@monster.mil> wrote:
[<http://groups.google.com/group/comp....msg/b05212e673
c1efb5?hl=en&dmode=source>]

> Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
> posting? This is a java forum. If I am interested in religious
> doctrine, I would subscribe to that forum!

Thank you for commenting on this article, which I have thoughtfully
elided. Please do not quote the entirety of articles in which you are
not interested. Please do not top post. Please note Followup-To.

--
John B. Matthews
trashgod at gmail dot com
home dot woh dot rr dot com slash jbmatthews

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:17:37 -0700, rajeevnair32 wrote:

> Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
> posting?
>
This isn't a forum, this is USENET, though some websites, such as Google
Groups, provide an inferior interface for the benefit of technically
challenged users.

Almost none of 30,000+ the newsgroups that make up Usenet are moderated:
the only one I read that is moderated is comp.risks

If you insist on reading newsgroups via some website there's nothing you
can do to avoid the garbage spread by trolls and spammers, so install a
decent newsreader and use that because the better ones have good kill
filing facilities. Try Thunderbird, Free Agent (if you're on Windows) or
Pan (for *nix).

And NEVER quote the junk if you must reply to it. Better yet, add the
author to your kill file and don't reply: replies only encourage the
trolls.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |

rajeevnair32@gmail.com writes:

> Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
> posting?

No and No.

On Aug 22, 2:13*pm, Martin Gregorie
<mar...@see.sig.for.address.invalid> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:17:37 -0700, rajeevnair32 wrote:
> > Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
> > posting?
>
> This isn't a forum, this is USENET, though some websites, such as Google
> Groups, provide an inferior interface for the benefit of [implied
> insult deleted] users.

None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.

reckoning54@gmail.com wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2:13 pm, Martin Gregorie
> <mar...@see.sig.for.address.invalid> wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:17:37 -0700, rajeevnair32 wrote:
>>> Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
>>> posting?
>> This isn't a forum, this is USENET, though some websites, such as Google
>> Groups, provide an inferior interface for the benefit of [implied
>> insult deleted] users.
>
> None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
> all true.
Well well, if it isn't Twisted, our friend who takes every little jab
personally.

--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:42:46 -0700, Daniel Pitts wrote:

> reckoning54@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2:13 pm, Martin Gregorie
>> <mar...@see.sig.for.address.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:17:37 -0700, rajeevnair32 wrote:
>>>> Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
>>>> posting?
>>> This isn't a forum, this is USENET, though some websites, such as
>>> Google Groups, provide an inferior interface for the benefit of
>>> [implied insult deleted] users.
>>
>> None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
>> all true.
> Well well, if it isn't Twisted, our friend who takes every little jab
> personally.

Yep, and this time he took something personally that had absolutely
nothing whatsoever to do with him.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |

Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:42:46 -0700, Daniel Pitts wrote:
>
>> reckoning54@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Aug 22, 2:13 pm, Martin Gregorie
>>> <mar...@see.sig.for.address.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:17:37 -0700, rajeevnair32 wrote:
>>>>> Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
>>>>> posting?
>>>> This isn't a forum, this is USENET, though some websites, such as
>>>> Google Groups, provide an inferior interface for the benefit of
>>>> [implied insult deleted] users.
>>> None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
>>> all true.
>> Well well, if it isn't Twisted, our friend who takes every little jab
>> personally.
>
> Yep, and this time he took something personally that had absolutely
> nothing whatsoever to do with him.
>
>
He uses GG, and didn't like being characterized as "technically
challenged". His stated goal is to rebut every suggestion that he is
less than perfect.

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:29:59 +0000, Lars Enderin wrote:

> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:42:46 -0700, Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>
>>> reckoning54@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Aug 22, 2:13 pm, Martin Gregorie
>>>> <mar...@see.sig.for.address.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:17:37 -0700, rajeevnair32 wrote:
>>>>>> Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy
>>>>>> from posting?
>>>>> This isn't a forum, this is USENET, though some websites, such as
>>>>> Google Groups, provide an inferior interface for the benefit of
>>>>> [implied insult deleted] users.
>>>> None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are
>>>> at all true.
>>> Well well, if it isn't Twisted, our friend who takes every little jab
>>> personally.
>>
>> Yep, and this time he took something personally that had absolutely
>> nothing whatsoever to do with him.
>>
>>
> He uses GG, and didn't like being characterized as "technically
> challenged". His stated goal is to rebut every suggestion that he is
> less than perfect.

Interesting that he'd take a gentle poke at GG users in general as a
specific attack. Can you make up a sentence including the words hyper-
sensitive, Twisted, self-confidence and no?


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |

On Aug 22, 6:42*pm, Daniel Pitts
<newsgroup.spamfil...@virtualinfinity.net> wrote:
> reckonin...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Aug 22, 2:13 pm, Martin Gregorie
> > <mar...@see.sig.for.address.invalid> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:17:37 -0700, rajeevnair32 wrote:
> >>> Is there any moderator on this forum? Can anybody stop this guy from
> >>> posting?
> >> This isn't a forum, this is USENET, though some websites, such as Google
> >> Groups, provide an inferior interface for the benefit of [implied
> >> insult deleted] users.
>
> > None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
> > all true.
>
> Well well, if it isn't Twisted, our friend who [insult deleted]

No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me
are at all true.