typo (or misreading) of hyperref prog2This is a discussion on typo (or misreading) of hyperref prog2 within the lisp forums in Programming Languages category; Hello, The documentation for prog2 seems incosistent in the hyperref: http://www.lispworks.com/documentati...y/m_prog1c.htm Under the Arguments and Values heading it is stated: result-2---the primary value resulting from the evaluation of second- form. Under the Description heading it is stated (my emphasis): prog2 evaluates first-form, then second-form, and then forms, yielding as its only value the primary value yielded by *first-form*. I think that the first statement is correct. Correct? Mirko... | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
08-21-2008, 09:34 AM
| |||
| |||
 typo (or misreading) of hyperref prog2 Hello, The documentation for prog2 seems incosistent in the hyperref: http://www.lispworks.com/documentati...y/m_prog1c.htm Under the Arguments and Values heading it is stated: result-2---the primary value resulting from the evaluation of second- form. Under the Description heading it is stated (my emphasis): prog2 evaluates first-form, then second-form, and then forms, yielding as its only value the primary value yielded by *first-form*. I think that the first statement is correct. Correct? Mirko  |
|
#2
08-21-2008, 10:40 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: typo (or misreading) of hyperref prog2 In article <2035cd7e-f6c8-4638-9a08-01919e15a67e@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, Mirko.Vukovic@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > The documentation for prog2 seems incosistent in the hyperref: > http://www.lispworks.com/documentati...y/m_prog1c.htm > > Under the Arguments and Values heading it is stated: > > result-2---the primary value resulting from the evaluation of second- > form. > > Under the Description heading it is stated (my emphasis): > > prog2 evaluates first-form, then second-form, and then forms, yielding > as its only value the primary value yielded by *first-form*. > > I think that the first statement is correct. Correct? > > Mirko See here: http://www.cliki.net/Proposed%20ANSI...Clarifications and here: http://www.cliki.net/Issue%20PROG2-RETURN-VALUE -- http://lispm.dyndns.org/ |
|
#3
08-21-2008, 10:49 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: typo (or misreading) of hyperref prog2 On Aug 21, 10:40 am, Rainer Joswig <jos...@lisp.de> wrote: > In article > <2035cd7e-f6c8-4638-9a08-01919e15a...@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Mirko.Vuko...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello, > > > The documentation for prog2 seems incosistent in the hyperref: > >http://www.lispworks.com/documentati...y/m_prog1c.htm > > > Under the Arguments and Values heading it is stated: > > > result-2---the primary value resulting from the evaluation of second- > > form. > > > Under the Description heading it is stated (my emphasis): > > > prog2 evaluates first-form, then second-form, and then forms, yielding > > as its only value the primary value yielded by *first-form*. > > > I think that the first statement is correct. Correct? > > > Mirko > > See here: > > http://www.cliki.net/Proposed%20ANSI...Clarifications > > and here: > > http://www.cliki.net/Issue%20PROG2-RETURN-VALUE > > --http://lispm.dyndns.org/ Thanks, I was not aware of that page. Mirko |
 |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.
