| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| This can't be "being a smug lisp weenie", can it be? Greenspun’s 10. Rule and Conway’s Interview on Perl 6 http://ileriseviye.org/blog/?p=962 ![]() -- Emre |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Emre Sevinc wrote: > This can't be "being a smug lisp weenie", can it be? > > Greenspun’s 10. Rule and Conway’s Interview on Perl 6 > http://ileriseviye.org/blog/?p=962 > Why did you delete the part where he acknowledged that Lisp has had this for fifty years?!...Oh my. Please tell me you deleted the part where he acknowledged that Lisp has had this for fifty years. kzo |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Emre Sevinc wrote: > This can't be "being a smug lisp weenie", can it be? Did Lisp have those features 50 years ago or were they introduced more recently? -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On 22 ago, 17:44, Jon Harrop <j...@ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > Emre Sevinc wrote: > > This can't be "being a smug lisp weenie", can it be? > > Did Lisp have those features 50 years ago or were they introduced more > recently? More recently still means way before perl 1 was born. Perl 6 is preaching for perl mongers, not people who know any better. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.