| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| On Aug 25, 12:33 am, Lennart Staflin <le...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > Scott Burson <FSet....@gmail.com> writes: > > To be honest, I don't think anyone is using FSet but me. I know, it > > could use more and better documentation -- though what's there is > > already well beyond what most open-source projects have. But I have > > other things to work on, and it's just not clear how many users FSet > > could attract even if I wrote reams more about it. > > Well, I tried to use it. Found a couple of bugs, but no way of > reporting bugs. I gave up on using it. > > Common-lisp.net kinda sucks. I got as far as to a trac page that > didn't even mention bugs. Much less how to create a bug report. Oh! Well, you could have emailed them to the FSet-devel list, or even just posted them here -- I probably would have seen them. I see what you mean about the Trac page not explaining itself very well -- I've just added a sentence that should help. Do you recall what the bugs were? -- Scott |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| On Aug 25, 4:43 am, Tamas K Papp <tkp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:22:09 -0700, Scott Burson wrote: > > But the benefits of FSet go beyond the functional semantics. Where CL > > just gives you the bare data structures and lets you use them as you > > wish, FSet collections are semantically loaded -- sets and sequences, > > for instance, are different types and support different operations. This > > allows code using them to be written more abstractly, and thus more > > elegantly. > > > Well, that's my opinion, anyway. I hope you'll give it a try. I'd love > > to hear what you think about it, whether you wind up using it or not. > > Hi Scott, > > I looked at your library, and I find the idea nice, but I won't be using > it. Mostly because I use matrices and vectors, and don't want to deal > with the overhead and possible bugs. Overhead? Yes, there is some, but compared with frequently making copies, it's probably faster. And obviously nobody wants to use a collections package that's going to lose data -- which is why I tested FSet very thoroughly before I released it. (I'm using it too, and I certainly don't want it to screw up!) > Also, when I call foreign > functions, I would have to convert, which would be a large PITA. Ah yes, well, that could be an annoyance. Oh well, thanks for taking a look at it anyway. -- Scott |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| On Aug 25, 8:34 am, Scott Burson <FSet....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 25, 12:33 am, Lennart Staflin <le...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > > > Scott Burson <FSet....@gmail.com> writes: > > > To be honest, I don't think anyone is using FSet but me. I know, it > > > could use more and better documentation -- though what's there is > > > already well beyond what most open-source projects have. But I have > > > other things to work on, and it's just not clear how many users FSet > > > could attract even if I wrote reams more about it. > > > Well, I tried to use it. Found a couple of bugs, but no way of > > reporting bugs. I gave up on using it. > > > Common-lisp.net kinda sucks. I got as far as to a trac page that > > didn't even mention bugs. Much less how to create a bug report. > > Oh! Well, you could have emailed them to the FSet-devel list, or even > just posted them here -- I probably would have seen them. I see what > you mean about the Trac page not explaining itself very well -- I've > just added a sentence that should help. Whoops, it's worse than that -- you have to have a common-lisp.net account to submit Trac tickets. My error was in recommending Trac on the FSet page as the default bug submission mechanism. Sorry for that. I have changed it to recommend the mailing list. I do hope you can remember what the bugs were. -- Scott |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| >>Scott Burson <FSet....@gmail.com> writes: >> >>>To be honest, I don't think anyone is using FSet but me. I have added it to my toolbox. No current requirement, but I am sure there will be. I think it is a solid hack and all round Good Thing to have at one's disposal. kt |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:19:17 -0700, Scott Burson wrote: > Whoops, it's worse than that -- you have to have a common-lisp.net > account to submit Trac tickets. My error was in recommending Trac on > the FSet page as the default bug submission mechanism. Sorry for that. > I have changed it to recommend the mailing list. you just need to do: trac-admin /project/fset/trac/ permission add anonymous TICKET_CREATE TICKET_APPEND -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| On Aug 25, 11:36 am, Stelian Ionescu <sione...@common-lisp.net> wrote: > you just need to do: > trac-admin /project/fset/trac/ permission add anonymous TICKET_CREATE > TICKET_APPEND Thanks. I may leave it as is, though -- now that I stop to think about it, I think it's probably better if bug reports go to the mailing list first. > Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. Hoc amo ![]() -- Scott |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Scott Burson <FSet.SLB@gmail.com> writes: > Do you recall what the bugs were? One was a missing function definition. map-merge isn't defined, but used in map reader syntax. -- Lennart Staflin <lenst@lysator.liu.se> |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| On Aug 25, 2:23 pm, Lennart Staflin <le...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > Scott Burson <FSet....@gmail.com> writes: > > Do you recall what the bugs were? > > One was a missing function definition. map-merge isn't defined, but > used in map reader syntax. Gack! Thank you ![]() -- Scott |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| * Scott Burson > Gack! Thank you ![]() While we're at it... I noticed that (fset:compare (make-symbol "FOO") (make-symbol "FOO")) --> :EQUAL -- Marcus |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| On Aug 26, 3:36 am, Marcus Breiing <use...@2008w34.mail.breiing.com> wrote: > * Scott Burson > > > Gack! Thank you ![]() > > While we're at it... I noticed that > > (fset:compare (make-symbol "FOO") (make-symbol "FOO")) > --> :EQUAL > Well. What should (FSET:COMPARE (+ 2.0 40) (* 2.0 21)) return? I'd bet it returns :EQUAL as well (I have not tried it and I I am just reading Scott's mined here )Cheers -- Marco |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.