| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi Can anyone tell me the best way to link Cache 5.xx to DSM. I am currently using DDP but I need to move one of the boxes across the other side of a router and am told that DDP is not routable. Also is DCP similar to DDP in the way that I can access globals on another systems using [UCI,VGP]. Thanks Jon |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <7e1133c0.0307220209.69f32944@posting.google.com >, Jon Astle <jon.astle@pat.nhs.uk> wrote: >Can anyone tell me the best way to link Cache 5.xx to DSM. I am >currently using DDP but I need to move one of the boxes across the >other side of a router and am told that DDP is not routable. Have you considered GRE tunnelling? -- -- Rod -- rodd(at)polylogics(dot)com |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Jon Astle wrote: > Hi > > Can anyone tell me the best way to link Cache 5.xx to DSM. I am > currently using DDP but I need to move one of the boxes across the > other side of a router and am told that DDP is not routable. > Also is DCP similar to DDP in the way that I can access globals on > another systems using [UCI,VGP]. > > Thanks > > Jon DSM supports DDP over TCP/IP; I don;t know about Cache 5.xx (never used it). Ray Newman |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I have heard that our routers (Cisco 6509) have the ability to tunnel but this means nothing to me. Can DDP/DCP be tunnelled ? Thanks rodd@panix.com (Rod Dorman) wrote in message news:<bfjtid$kb5$1@reader1.panix.com>... > In article <7e1133c0.0307220209.69f32944@posting.google.com >, > Jon Astle <jon.astle@pat.nhs.uk> wrote: > >Can anyone tell me the best way to link Cache 5.xx to DSM. I am > >currently using DDP but I need to move one of the boxes across the > >other side of a router and am told that DDP is not routable. > > Have you considered GRE tunnelling? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <7e1133c0.0307230300.12056c11@posting.google.com >, Jon Astle <jon.astle@pat.nhs.uk> wrote: >I have heard that our routers (Cisco 6509) AFAIK the Catalyst 6500 Series are switches not routers. There may be some layer 3 functionallity I'm not familiar with Cisco switches. >have the ability to tunnel but this means nothing to me. Tunneling is just a point-to-point link. A way to encapsulate arbitrary packets inside a transport protocol. >Can DDP/DCP be tunnelled ? In theory yes. Tunneling can handle AppleTalk, DECnet, and IPX so unless there's something really peculiar about it you should be able to do it. -- -- Rod -- rodd(at)polylogics(dot)com |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Jon DCP is similar to DDP in that respect, but keeps (up to a) 63 block local network cache on the client, for each process. Note that the cache is not shareable amongst other client processes. You should get greatly improved read performance with DCP. Note that there may be licensing costs involved depending on the existing license types already in place. Andre ISC Sales Engineering "Jon Astle" <jon.astle@pat.nhs.uk> wrote in message news:7e1133c0.0307220209.69f32944@posting.google.c om... > Hi > > Can anyone tell me the best way to link Cache 5.xx to DSM. I am > currently using DDP but I need to move one of the boxes across the > other side of a router and am told that DDP is not routable. > Also is DCP similar to DDP in the way that I can access globals on > another systems using [UCI,VGP]. > > Thanks > > Jon |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.