| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Don't flame me about bottom-posting vs top-posting. I prefer bottom-posting in both email and newsgroups myself. But at work, I am vastly outnumbered by Outlook users, and it is not reasonable for me to write my responses at the bottom of long email threads that go the other direction. So, my question is: is there a way to make mutt add its signature at the top in a suitable fashion to accomodate this standard? Currently, what I have to do is page to the bottom of the thread I'm replying to, cut my signature out, return to the top and paste it. Its a pain. Thanks. -Jeff |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:01:30 GMT, Jeffrey Cunningham wrote: > vastly outnumbered by Outlook users, and it is not reasonable for me to > write my responses at the bottom of long email threads that go the other > direction. You could always cut the redundant quotes... > So, my question is: is there a way to make mutt add its signature at the > top in a suitable fashion to accomodate this standard? Currently, what I No. -- Paul Damn... now have a mental image of a penguin crossed with John Wayne and John Travolta doing a strange cover of 'Staying Alive'... -- Jak in a.s.r |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:01:30 GMT, Jeffrey Cunningham wrote: > Don't flame me about bottom-posting vs top-posting. I prefer > bottom-posting in both email and newsgroups myself. But at work, I am > vastly outnumbered by Outlook users, and it is not reasonable for me to > write my responses at the bottom of long email threads that go the other > direction. Argh. Damn, but that's hard.... > So, my question is: is there a way to make mutt add its signature at the > top in a suitable fashion to accomodate this standard? Currently, what I > have to do is page to the bottom of the thread I'm replying to, cut my > signature out, return to the top and paste it. Its a pain. Set $signature to null, set your editor command to insert your signature at the top or after the first blank line, depending on whether you edit headers or not. Details left as an exercise, but I know I've seen awk scripts for doing such things with vi. -- _ o |/) |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:20:01 -0500, Peter H. Coffin wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:01:30 GMT, Jeffrey Cunningham wrote: >> Don't flame me about bottom-posting vs top-posting. I prefer >> bottom-posting in both email and newsgroups myself. But at work, I am >> vastly outnumbered by Outlook users, and it is not reasonable for me to >> write my responses at the bottom of long email threads that go the other >> direction. > > Argh. Damn, but that's hard.... > >> So, my question is: is there a way to make mutt add its signature at the >> top in a suitable fashion to accomodate this standard? Currently, what I >> have to do is page to the bottom of the thread I'm replying to, cut my >> signature out, return to the top and paste it. Its a pain. > > Set $signature to null, set your editor command to insert your signature > at the top or after the first blank line, depending on whether you edit > headers or not. Details left as an exercise, but I know I've seen awk > scripts for doing such things with vi. Hmmmm... Now there's an idea. If there's no built in way, I can probably make that work. Thanks. -Jeff |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 17 May 2004 19:41:28 GMT, Jeffrey Cunningham <jeffrey.k.cunningham@boeing.com> wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:20:01 -0500, Peter H. Coffin wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:01:30 GMT, Jeffrey Cunningham wrote: >>> Don't flame me about bottom-posting vs top-posting. I prefer >>> bottom-posting in both email and newsgroups myself. But at work, I am >>> vastly outnumbered by Outlook users, and it is not reasonable for me to >>> write my responses at the bottom of long email threads that go the other >>> direction. >> >> Argh. Damn, but that's hard.... >> >>> So, my question is: is there a way to make mutt add its signature at the >>> top in a suitable fashion to accomodate this standard? Currently, what I >>> have to do is page to the bottom of the thread I'm replying to, cut my >>> signature out, return to the top and paste it. Its a pain. >> >> Set $signature to null, set your editor command to insert your signature >> at the top or after the first blank line, depending on whether you edit >> headers or not. Details left as an exercise, but I know I've seen awk >> scripts for doing such things with vi. > > Hmmmm... Now there's an idea. If there's no built in way, I can probably > make that work. Thanks. > > -Jeff Use 'set sig_on_top'. It is in 1.5.4 -- Brian Salter-Duke Humpty Doo, Nr Darwin, Australia My real address is b_duke(AT)octa4(DOT)net(DOT)au Use this for reply or followup |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 17 May 2004 22:39:03 GMT, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > Use 'set sig_on_top'. It is in 1.5.4 So it is, I'd forgotten about that. Oops. -- Paul "20% of all road accidents in Sweden involve a moose." Unknown |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Jeffrey Cunningham <jeffrey.k.cunningham@boeing.com> wrote: > Don't flame me about bottom-posting vs top-posting. I prefer > bottom-posting in both email and newsgroups myself. But at work, I am > vastly outnumbered by Outlook users, and it is not reasonable for me to > write my responses at the bottom of long email threads that go the other > direction. > If I *need* to reply to a long thread arranged this way I actually re-arrange all the Outlook rubbish the *right* way (with lots of snipping) and then ask everyone to reply below so that the result remains vaguely intelligible. -- Chris Green |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 17 May 2004 22:39:03 +0000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > Use 'set sig_on_top'. It is in 1.5.4 Thank you! I sort of figured a code as extensible as Mutt would have worked this problem already. However self-satisfying it might be to try to *correct* the world, it is not always worth the energy expenditure. Its not the hill I want to die on. ;-) Thanks again. -Jeff |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Jeffrey Cunningham <jeffrey.k.cunningham@boeing.com> wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2004 22:39:03 +0000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > >> Use 'set sig_on_top'. It is in 1.5.4 > > > Thank you! I sort of figured a code as extensible as Mutt would have > worked this problem already. However self-satisfying it might be to try to > *correct* the world, it is not always worth the energy expenditure. > Its not the hill I want to die on. ;-) Right. I correspond with mostly Outlook users at work, so I have these macros for switching between Outlook and "Internet" reply styles. # Turn Outlook-style replies on (,O) and off (,o). # macro index ,O ':set sig_on_top;set indent_string="";set header;set attribution="-----Original Message-----"<Return>' "set Outlook-style replies" macro pager ,O ':set sig_on_top;set indent_string="";set header;set attribution="-----Original Message-----"<Return>' "set Outlook-style replies" macro index ,o ':unset sig_on_top;set indent_string="> ";unset header;set attribution="On %{%Y-%m-%d}, %f wrote:"<Return>' "set Internet-style replies" macro pager ,o ':unset sig_on_top;set indent_string="> ";unset header;set attribution="On %{%Y-%m-%d}, %f wrote:"<Return>' "set Internet-style replies" HTH, Gary |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.