=?ISO-8859-1?Q?I_think_C64_games_are_better_than_today=B4s_PC _crap?=

This is a discussion on =?ISO-8859-1?Q?I_think_C64_games_are_better_than_today=B4s_PC _crap?= within the Other Technologies forums in category; Christine Keegan wrote: > I am reading your message and am well impressed. To be honest I have > absolutely no idea what you are writing about. I am are present > teaching myself about newsgroups and am sure that some time in the > future it will click into place (hopefully). I'm even more impressed, since you seem to be answering to an invisible message (or have you forgotten to quote by accident?) ;-) g...

Go Back   Application Development Forum > Other Technologies

Object Mix

Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #71  
Old 05-06-2004, 01:06 PM
G.I.L
Guest
 
Default Re: I think C64 games are better than today´s PC crap

Christine Keegan wrote:
> I am reading your message and am well impressed. To be honest I have
> absolutely no idea what you are writing about. I am are present
> teaching myself about newsgroups and am sure that some time in the
> future it will click into place (hopefully).


I'm even more impressed, since you seem to be answering to an invisible
message (or have you forgotten to quote by accident?)

;-)

g


Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 05-06-2004, 07:55 PM
Bent C Dalager
Guest
 
Default Re: I think C64 games are better than today´s PC crap

In article <409a619a$1@news.012.net.il>, G.I.L <not@all.com> wrote:
>
>I'm even more impressed, since you seem to be answering to an invisible
>message (or have you forgotten to quote by accident?)


I find that I very rarely quote by accident. Do you think this is a
skill I should look into acquiring? :-)

Cheers
Bent D
--
Bent Dalager - bcd@pvv.org - http://www.pvv.org/~bcd
powered by emacs
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 05-07-2004, 10:07 AM
G.I.L
Guest
 
Default Re: I think C64 games are better than today´s PC crap

Bent C Dalager wrote:
> In article <409a619a$1@news.012.net.il>, G.I.L <not@all.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm even more impressed, since you seem to be answering to an
>> invisible message (or have you forgotten to quote by accident?)

>
> I find that I very rarely quote by accident. Do you think this is a
> skill I should look into acquiring? :-)


No no no. You've got me all wrong. I meant she should have quoted the famous
writer, By Accident (of course it isn't his real name...). I'm especially
fond of his famous quote: "Who the hell were you talking to?".

;-)

g


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.