| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I have used X-10 to turn my holiday lights on and off for years mainly because we have so many lights. We put on a good show for Halloween and right after I start putting up 27,000 Christmas lights. I have been increasing the complexity of our display every year with some animations and flashing lights but it is vary difficult and time consuming using Activehome and the X-10 hardware. I would like to take it to the next level this year but can not find any good X-10 software to use. I have been looking at the software offerings and am having a hard time finding something to help me to the next level. I have looked at allot of the free stuff and found most can not be programmed faster than 1 sec. not fast enough for sequencing dancing lights and still time consuming to program. Looking at allot of the paid programs I can not determine if it will help without buying them all. I am looking for a X-10 control program that is easy to program sequences down to a tenth of a second to do some dancing lights in my 45 foot charismas tree this year. Can anybody tell me if the software they are using mite be able to help or should I scrap the hole idea and us some thing like Weed Techs digital I/O board and hope to find some good control software for it to do dancing lights. The ultimate for me would be a program that would run off an excel spread sheet where if a box is filled to would turn on an output and stay on if more boxes where filled and then off at the next clear box running over time. I have seen all the ready made charismas light hardware and software but I do not have the time or money to go that route and was hoping to save some of my investment in X-10 that has served me well all these years leading up to this point. Thanks Andy |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| X10 is not capable of sub 1 second control. A normal X10 command takes two messages, such as A-1, A-ON. With the 3 cycle intermessage gap, a complete command takes 47 cycles of 60Hz. Another 3 cycle gap is needed before another message can be sent. I would use a PC controlling a bunch of solid state relays. Years ago I built custom factory automation equipment using DOS era PCs, and even that would be capable of doing what you want. Jeff "ANDREW GREGORY" <4pyros@verizon.net> wrote in message news nBYg.1136$Dg5.1061@trndny09...> I have used X-10 to turn my holiday lights on and off for years mainly > because we have so many lights. We put on a good show for Halloween and > right after I start putting up 27,000 Christmas lights. I have been > increasing the complexity of our display every year with some animations and > flashing lights but it is vary difficult and time consuming using Activehome > and the X-10 hardware. I would like to take it to the next level this year > but can not find any good X-10 software to use. > I have been looking at the software offerings and am having a hard time > finding something to help me to the next level. I have looked at allot of > the free stuff and found most can not be programmed faster than 1 sec. not > fast enough for sequencing dancing lights and still time consuming to > program. Looking at allot of the paid programs I can not determine if it > will help without buying them all. > I am looking for a X-10 control program that is easy to program sequences > down to a tenth of a second to do some dancing lights in my 45 foot > charismas tree this year. Can anybody tell me if the software they are using > mite be able to help or should I scrap the hole idea and us some thing like > Weed Techs digital I/O board and hope to find some good control software for > it to do dancing lights. > The ultimate for me would be a program that would run off an excel spread > sheet where if a box is filled to would turn on an output and stay on if > more boxes where filled and then off at the next clear box running over > time. > I have seen all the ready made charismas light hardware and software but I > do not have the time or money to go that route and was hoping to save some > of my investment in X-10 that has served me well all these years leading up > to this point. > > Thanks Andy |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| ANDREW GREGORY wrote: > I have used X-10 to turn my holiday lights on and off for years mainly > because we have so many lights. We put on a good show for Halloween and > right after I start putting up 27,000 Christmas lights. I have been > increasing the complexity of our display every year with some animations and > flashing lights but it is vary difficult and time consuming using Activehome > and the X-10 hardware. I would like to take it to the next level this year > but can not find any good X-10 software to use. > I have been looking at the software offerings and am having a hard time > finding something to help me to the next level. I have looked at allot of > the free stuff and found most can not be programmed faster than 1 sec. not > fast enough for sequencing dancing lights and still time consuming to > program. Looking at allot of the paid programs I can not determine if it > will help without buying them all. > I am looking for a X-10 control program that is easy to program sequences > down to a tenth of a second to do some dancing lights in my 45 foot > charismas tree this year. Can anybody tell me if the software they are using > mite be able to help or should I scrap the hole idea and us some thing like > Weed Techs digital I/O board and hope to find some good control software for > it to do dancing lights. > The ultimate for me would be a program that would run off an excel spread > sheet where if a box is filled to would turn on an output and stay on if > more boxes where filled and then off at the next clear box running over > time. > I have seen all the ready made charismas light hardware and software but I > do not have the time or money to go that route and was hoping to save some > of my investment in X-10 that has served me well all these years leading up > to this point. > > Thanks Andy > > http://www.lightorama.com/products.html just what you need. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:37:24 GMT, ANDREW GREGORY <4pyros@verizon.net> wrote: > I am looking for a X-10 control program that is easy to program sequences > down to a tenth of a second to do some dancing lights in my 45 foot Not going to happen. X10 is too slow. > I have seen all the ready made charismas light hardware and software but I > do not have the time or money to go that route and was hoping to save some You can save time by spending money. Or save money by spending time. You will need to determine where on that scale you need to be. > of my investment in X-10 that has served me well all these years leading up You can use X10 for the slow stuff (1sec or slower) and start adding faster stuff for the faster effects. As for software... I do my own. Sorry. You can find more software and hardware info at sites such as http://computerchristmas.com/ (highly recommended) See their "how-to" and forum sections. If you aren't comfortable doing 120vAC component wiring, controllers can be purchased, but they aren't what I would call cheap. Long and boring hardware details follow... ----------- If you are up to doing 120vAC component wiring, you can save money by spending time. You can build controllers using a solid-state relay (SSR) controlled from a parallel port and switching a 120v circuit. Or for cheaper you can build your own SSR using an opto-coupler (to protect the parallel port) and a triac. I have been able to buy SSRs cheap enough on the surplus market that I haven't bothered with triac circuits. For example, this looks like it would work well: http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bi..._CONTROL_.html (http://www.allelectronics.com/ then Relays then Solid-State) home page at: http://www.crydom.com/products/productFamily.aspx?id=22 detail spec: http://www.crydom.com/userResources/.../crydom_ez.pdf The 3-15vdc control input means most PC parallel ports should be able to control the relay. The 240vac at up to 18amps means you can switch about as many lights as you would ever put on one circuit. (Probably you want to keep the number under 50%, or less than 9 amps because these relays will need a heat sink to keep them cool when running large loads or high ambient temperatures.) That particular relay is "zero crossing" which minimizes the interferance to TV and radio reception, but also means you cannot make a light dimmer or ramp brightness up or down as well as a "random" switching relay. At under $10/ea buying a dozen is maybe half of retail price. (A typical PC parallel port can typically control 12 such relays.) Sometimes you can find even better deals. AllElectronics also lists a 1amp SSR for $1.50. that might be enough for each channel. Can't find good specs on it though. However at that price I'm tempted to buy a dozen just to play with. Small enough to mount right on the outlet and probably easy to fit four of them into a four-gang metal box with two duplex outlets... I build my controllers in sets of four (four independently switched outlets in a metal box) with a short 120vAC plug for power and an RJ45 (8 conductor "network" jack) for control input. (of the 8 control wires, four (two pair) control the circuits, two (one pair) provide ground, and the last two (one pair) provide power (which these simple relay boxes do not need or use). I use the standard power-over-ethernet wiring for the power distribution and use what would normally be "ethernet" wires for the control signals. Then I can use up to three such boxes per parallel port. Because I use standard jacks I can use whatever off-the-shelf patch cord I want between my parallel port adapter and the box. I've used up to 100ft patch with no problems. I've toyed with the idea of building an expansion for the parallel port to control more boxes, but it seems too tedious so I haven't. ----------- Anybody have a source for cheap PCI parallel port cards (e.g. four parallel ports on one card)? sdb -- Wanted: Omnibook 800 & accessories, cheap, working or not sdbuse1 on mailhost bigfoot.com |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:24:48 -0600, sylvan butler <ZsdbUse1+noZs_0610@Zbigfoot.Zcom.invalid> wrote in message <slrnejam1g.thm.ZsdbUse1+noZs_0610@sdba64.internal >: >Anybody have a source for cheap PCI parallel port cards (e.g. four >parallel ports on one card)? Never seen such a beast. A venerable and still current solution to the need for multiple digital (TTL) input-output (I/O) are ISA- and PCI-bus cards based on the 8255 Programmable Input Output (PIO) IC from the 8080 chip family which predated the original 8088 IBM PC. Google 8255 PIO for hardware, drivers and software ideas. There are typically many for sale at eBay for nickels on the dollar. Business & Industrial > Industrial Electrical & Test > Test Equipment > Card Based (VXI/PXI/PCI) The current National Instruments DIO cards are the PCI-6503 (24 TTL I/O), PCI-DIO-96 (96 TTL I/O) and PCI- 6257 (48 I/O, optically isolated with 120ma drive). (I'll be having an internet porch sale in a couple of weeks and will have a pile of these and related instrumentation and HA items for sale/swap.) HTH ... Marc Marc_F_Hult www.ECOntrol.org |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:24:03 -0400, Marc_F_Hult <MFHult@nothydrologistnot.com> wrote in message <a7kcj2d5csnnucnn97c1amofkhkftb39mk@4ax.com>: >The current National Instruments DIO cards are the PCI-6503 (24 TTL I/O), >PCI-DIO-96 (96 TTL I/O) and PCI- 6257 (48 I/O, optically isolated with 120ma >drive). oops. Its PCI-6527, not 6257 .... Marc |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In article <slrnejam1g.thm.ZsdbUse1+noZs_0610@sdba64.internal >, sylvan butler <ZsdbUse1+noZs_0610@Zbigfoot.Zcom.invalid> wrote: > >Anybody have a source for cheap PCI parallel port cards (e.g. four >parallel ports on one card)? Why not use MIDI? There's a very inexpensive controller that you could build (midibox.org) that will give 128 inputs and outputs. More can be added by just daisy chaining more controllers on the MIDI cable. You can program with free MIDI sequencing software. You'd also have the capability of syncing easily to a sound track! ---john. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| > Why not use MIDI? There's a very inexpensive controller that you could > build (midibox.org) that will give 128 inputs and outputs. More can > be added by just daisy chaining more controllers on the MIDI cable. > You can program with free MIDI sequencing software. You'd also have > the capability of syncing easily to a sound track! Good point, John. One of my favorite Christmas displays is about three miles down Proctor Rd from my home in Sarasota. There are something like 400,000 (really) lights on all kinds of moving displays. Everything is sequenced to a MIDI soundtrack playing traditional Christmas hymns through speakers hidden in the trees. The entire theme is really about Christmas -- no Santa and no reindeer. Every year they add to the display. It's a pretty famous light show, attracting visitors from all over the world every year. This is a private home, by the way. -- Regards, Robert L Bass =============================> Bass Home Electronics 4883 Fallcrest Circle Sarasota · Florida · 34233 http://www.bassburglaralarms.com =============================> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:24:48 -0600, sylvan butler <ZsdbUse1+noZs_0610@Zbigfoot.Zcom.invalid> wrote: >Anybody have a source for cheap PCI parallel port cards (e.g. four >parallel ports on one card)? The below board might be better than parallel ports. http://www.futurlec.com/RS232DevBoard.shtml |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:56:52 GMT, Si Ballenger <shb*NO*SPAM*@comporium.net> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:24:48 -0600, sylvan butler ><ZsdbUse1+noZs_0610@Zbigfoot.Zcom.invalid> wrote: > >>Anybody have a source for cheap PCI parallel port cards (e.g. four >>parallel ports on one card)? > > The below board might be better than parallel ports. > > http://www.futurlec.com/RS232DevBoard.shtml That looks like a nice I/O board. But I'm skeptical of the speed at which one could arbitrarily change the bits. For example, walking-1 or walking-0 thru the entire set, or invert all or some arbitrary subset (xor), and other common effect operations. Something like these (similar to what Marc pointed out) is more likely to be fast enough: http://www.futurlec.com/PCI16IO.shtml or http://www.futurlec.com/PCI8255.shtml That actually looks like a nice card. Each 8255 is roughly two XT/AT style parallel ports so if it is designed well, that card might do what I need, and the price isn't too far out either. Too bad Futurelec doesn't put detailed tech info online. There's no way I'd be using Windows! Of course, for that price I could build a PIC based solution and not need a PC at all... sdb -- Wanted: Omnibook 800 & accessories, cheap, working or not sdbuse1 on mailhost bigfoot.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.