ANNOUNCE: GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter

"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B12CC448E323castleamber@130.133.1.4...
>
>> Just post a complete page
>
> Talking about posting, don't quote sigs.
>
> As for your announcement, it starts to look more an more like an
> advertisement, which might piss off some people after a while.
>
> As for your license, check out the wording of:
> http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html
>
> To make things easier, you might want to pick a known license and
> use the wording of that one, for example the Artistic License (2.0).
>
> See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artistic_License
>


It would be, perhaps, more precisse to say that some users are in good mood
rarely.

Speaking of licenses, Im familiar with couple, and Artistic, which is nice.
You should read these licenses, and you will notice that those created with
legal advice or expertise, say in essence "to help and improve"... nothing
else.
It does not say "with purpose of forcing a restriction".
Any restriction license has, is with main intention to help.

There is not one license that says "you must use this license, or if not,
then you must use another license".
(this is only how some users interpret the concept of license, and that
interpretation is wrong)
Also, if that was true, none of licenses now could exist because it creates
something of a chicken and the egg problem.

A user says- license must be used. It is basically using a tool for
protecting freedom to destroy some other freedom, ie freedom to not use a
license.
To mention, for some designs, concepts, or solutions widely accepted today,
not so long ago many were less than happy to adopt and use, saying "never"..
etc.
Today, these same people say of course yes engrave it on my tomb stone.
Whether it's an os, software, somethin gelse.
Now somebody objected here.. lets see.. Who was it?

regards