ANNOUNCE: GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter

GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter
------------------------------------

GromPerl is persistent Perl interpreter for Unix-like operating systems
provided by Bauk HTTP server's Grom persistent interpreter connector
library.

Perl interpreter compiled and linked with Grom persistent interpreter
connector library creates Perl interpreter capable of operating in
persistent mode and executing *.pl scripts in web directory.


Download:
http://www.bauk.ws/gromperl.html
http://www.bauk.ws/readme.html#gromconnector

GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter
Grom persistent interpreter connector library

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:43:45 +0200, MVC net wrote:

> GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter
> ------------------------------------
>
> GromPerl is persistent Perl interpreter for Unix-like operating systems
> provided by Bauk HTTP server's Grom persistent interpreter connector
> library.
>
> Perl interpreter compiled and linked with Grom persistent interpreter
> connector library creates Perl interpreter capable of operating in
> persistent mode and executing *.pl scripts in web directory.
>
>
> Download:
> http://www.bauk.ws/gromperl.html
> http://www.bauk.ws/readme.html#gromconnector
>
> GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter
> Grom persistent interpreter connector library

Dude, if you announce something, put some news in it. This is the fourth
time (not counting the double post) in as many months that you post
almost exactly the same message here. This really gets boring.

Regards

Leon Timmermans

>>>>> "Leon" == Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> writes:

>> GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter
>> Grom persistent interpreter connector library

Leon> Dude, if you announce something, put some news in it. This is the fourth
Leon> time (not counting the double post) in as many months that you post
Leon> almost exactly the same message here. This really gets boring.

Considered also this little gem (from http://www.bauk.ws/?terms):

Bauk HTTP server
Copyright (C) 2008. Bauk Development Team
Released in public domain.

"Public domain" isn't a valid license everywhere, and would actually revert to
"all rights reserved as specified by copyright" in some regions.

If you're intending this to be useful and used, please use a valid license.

print "Just another Perl hacker,"; # the original

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion

"Leon Timmermans" <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:48c425ca$0$188$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>> GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> GromPerl is persistent Perl interpreter for Unix-like operating systems
>> provided by Bauk HTTP server's Grom persistent interpreter connector
>> library.
>>
>> Perl interpreter compiled and linked with Grom persistent interpreter
>> connector library creates Perl interpreter capable of operating in
>> persistent mode and executing *.pl scripts in web directory.
>>
>>
>> Download:
>> http://www.bauk.ws/gromperl.html
>> http://www.bauk.ws/readme.html#gromconnector
>>
>> GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter
>> Grom persistent interpreter connector library
>
> Dude, if you announce something, put some news in it. This is the fourth
> time (not counting the double post) in as many months that you post
> almost exactly the same message here. This really gets boring.
>
> Regards
>
> Leon Timmermans



It seems that you do not miss an opportunity.

"Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote in message
news:861vzv4s9p.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com...
>>>>>> "Leon" == Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> GromPerl persistent Perl interpreter
>>> Grom persistent interpreter connector library
>
> Leon> Dude, if you announce something, put some news in it. This is the
> fourth
> Leon> time (not counting the double post) in as many months that you post
> Leon> almost exactly the same message here. This really gets boring.
>
> Considered also this little gem (from http://www.bauk.ws/?terms):
>
> Bauk HTTP server
> Copyright (C) 2008. Bauk Development Team
> Released in public domain.
>
> "Public domain" isn't a valid license everywhere, and would actually
> revert to
> "all rights reserved as specified by copyright" in some regions.
>
> If you're intending this to be useful and used, please use a valid
> license.
>
> print "Just another jacker,"; # the original
>
> --
>


You should have posted actual contents of the page.
It is somewhat different from what you say.

"MVC net" <gromnospam@googlemail.com> wrote:

> "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote in message
> news:861vzv4s9p.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com...

[..]

>> Considered also this little gem (from http://www.bauk.ws/?terms):
>>
>> Bauk HTTP server
>> Copyright (C) 2008. Bauk Development Team
>> Released in public domain.

> You should have posted actual contents of the page.
> It is somewhat different from what you say.

Bauk HTTP server
Copyright (C) 2008. Bauk Development Team
Released in public domain.

He did. Maybe you should check your computer for malware if you read
something different, especially before you accuse people from lying.

--
John http://johnbokma.com/ - Hacking & Hiking in Mexico

Perl help in exchange for a gift:
http://johnbokma.com/perl/help-in-ex...or-a-gift.html

"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B12C17B95074castleamber@130.133.1.4...
>>> Considered also this little gem (from http://www.bauk.ws/?terms):
>>>
>>> Bauk HTTP server
>>> Copyright (C) 2008. Bauk Development Team
>>> Released in public domain.
>
>> You should have posted actual contents of the page.
>> It is somewhat different from what you say.
>
> Bauk HTTP server
> Copyright (C) 2008. Bauk Development Team
> Released in public domain.
>
> He did. Maybe you should check your computer for malware if you read
> something different, especially before you accuse people from lying.
>
> --
> John http://johnbokma.com/ - Hacking & Hiking in Mexico
>


Just post a complete page

"MVC net" <gromnospam@googlemail.com> wrote:

>
> "John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message

[..]

> Just post a complete page

Talking about posting, don't quote sigs.

As for your announcement, it starts to look more an more like an
advertisement, which might piss off some people after a while.

As for your license, check out the wording of:
http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html

To make things easier, you might want to pick a known license and
use the wording of that one, for example the Artistic License (2.0).

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artistic_License

--
John http://johnbokma.com/ - Hacking & Hiking in Mexico

Perl help in exchange for a gift:
http://johnbokma.com/perl/help-in-ex...or-a-gift.html

On 2008-09-08, MVC net <gromnospam@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Just post a complete page

You mean like this?

Licence

Bauk Web server, included package, libraries and tools are distributed
as free, open-source software for personal or commercial use, without
restrictions and limitations.
Remember rightful authors if using design concepts, parts or components
of Bauk software.


That just seems like a cruel joke. It implies to someone less clueful
that your license means something. If you want to accurately call your
software "open-source" you need to actually use a license that is open
source e.g. http://opensource.org/licenses/category .

--keith


--
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information

"Keith Keller" <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote in message
news:6nfep5xbi5.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us...
>
> That just seems like a cruel joke. It implies to someone less clueful
> that your license means something. If you want to accurately call your
> software "open-source" you need to actually use a license that is open
> source e.g. http://opensource.org/licenses/category .
>

You probably did not read it.
here is the open source definition:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php

In that document it does not say anywhere "software need to use a license
that is opensource to be open source.". (??)

That document says software or license is considered "opesource", if
conditions 123.. for this and this reason, etc. are met.
(which is logical, and in this specific case conditions are met)

It brings us back to original proprietary license, where did you see it is
not in sync with above definition.