are email address could be spammed - PHP

2008. 01. 24, csütörtök keltezéssel 11.40-kor clive ezt írta:
> http://www.mail4liste.de/viewtopic.p...9a090cdea0c688
>

read back the archives, this has been discussed already. our addresses
are already public, as we use them to answer mails on this list. so it
does not matter at all. but if you ask Dan, he will remove your address
from the report surely.

greets
Zoltán Németh

hi clive,

it's 'our email' not 'are email' ;-) and yes we know about this problem.
nothing much we can do about it

clive schreef:
> http://www.mail4liste.de/viewtopic.p...9a090cdea0c688
>

On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 AM, Jochem Maas <jochem@iamjochem.com> wrote:

> it's 'our email' not 'are email' ;-) and yes we know about this problem.
> nothing much we can do about it


get gmail; it works like a charm

-nathan

Nathan Nobbe schreef:
> On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 AM, Jochem Maas <jochem@iamjochem.com> wrote:
>
>> it's 'our email' not 'are email' ;-) and yes we know about this problem.
>> nothing much we can do about it
>
>
> get gmail; it works like a charm

like a charm for the marketing, ad-shovelling sales whores at google you.
my mail server is fine thanks, plaster my email address all over the web for
all I care.

>
> -nathan
>

On Jan 24, 2008 10:26 AM, Jochem Maas <jochem@iamjochem.com> wrote:

> like a charm for the marketing, ad-shovelling sales whores at google you.


i dont know man; its a pretty nice user interface. i might try to setup an
open
source web interface for my server when i get the time, but for now i can
use
gmail to interface w/ my personal mail server as well; thats pretty
convenient.
check this one out; from the same guys that make trac (edgewall)
http://posterity.edgewall.org/

my mail server is fine thanks, plaster my email address all over the web for
> all I care.


thats cool, what i was really getting at is that gmail handles the spam
issues w/
next to no hassle. im sure there are plenty of solutions to protect
personal mail
servers as well, such as spam assassin. the whole spam thing really isnt a
big
issue for me, and sounds like it isnt for you either

-nathan

On Jan 24, 2008 10:36 AM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 10:26 AM, Jochem Maas <jochem@iamjochem.com> wrote:
>
> > like a charm for the marketing, ad-shovelling sales whores at google you.
>
>
> i dont know man; its a pretty nice user interface. i might try to setup an
> open
> source web interface for my server when i get the time, but for now i can
> use
> gmail to interface w/ my personal mail server as well; thats pretty
> convenient.
> check this one out; from the same guys that make trac (edgewall)
> http://posterity.edgewall.org/
>
> my mail server is fine thanks, plaster my email address all over the web for
> > all I care.
>
>
> thats cool, what i was really getting at is that gmail handles the spam
> issues w/
> next to no hassle. im sure there are plenty of solutions to protect
> personal mail
> servers as well, such as spam assassin. the whole spam thing really isnt a
> big
> issue for me, and sounds like it isnt for you either
>
> -nathan
>

I used to be hardcore pop only but now that I use gmail I don't care
about any other mail client. It beats Thunderbird and Mail.app hands
down. If you don't look at the right hand side you won't see the ads.
I even have it set up now to pull my pop mail account and slap it
in a filter. Plus I enjoy all the people complaining about how users
shouldn't change the subject. The gmail thread grouping takes care of
all that for me. The only real downside is you can't view the raw
source of messages or get the headers.

As Nathan said, the spam filter is really good too.

On 24 Jan 2008, at 15:42, Eric Butera wrote:
> I used to be hardcore pop only but now that I use gmail I don't care
> about any other mail client. It beats Thunderbird and Mail.app hands
> down. If you don't look at the right hand side you won't see the ads.
> I even have it set up now to pull my pop mail account and slap it
> in a filter. Plus I enjoy all the people complaining about how users
> shouldn't change the subject. The gmail thread grouping takes care of
> all that for me. The only real downside is you can't view the raw
> source of messages or get the headers.

Top-right of any message, the down arrow next to the Reply link,
select Show Original... voila, the raw message complete with all
headers.

I'm almost exclusively using Google Apps for all my mail (just a
couple of accounts left to move), and nothing much has changed about
what I do. I still have the choice between Thunderbird (IMAP) or
Webmail (Gmail), and I still have a complete archive of all my mail
since 1996. I have no complaints at all.

-Stut

--
http://stut.net/

On Jan 24, 2008 10:56 AM, Stut <stuttle@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 24 Jan 2008, at 15:42, Eric Butera wrote:
> > I used to be hardcore pop only but now that I use gmail I don't care
> > about any other mail client. It beats Thunderbird and Mail.app hands
> > down. If you don't look at the right hand side you won't see the ads.
> > I even have it set up now to pull my pop mail account and slap it
> > in a filter. Plus I enjoy all the people complaining about how users
> > shouldn't change the subject. The gmail thread grouping takes care of
> > all that for me. The only real downside is you can't view the raw
> > source of messages or get the headers.
>
> Top-right of any message, the down arrow next to the Reply link,
> select Show Original... voila, the raw message complete with all
> headers.
>
> I'm almost exclusively using Google Apps for all my mail (just a
> couple of accounts left to move), and nothing much has changed about
> what I do. I still have the choice between Thunderbird (IMAP) or
> Webmail (Gmail), and I still have a complete archive of all my mail
> since 1996. I have no complaints at all.
>
> -Stut
>
> --
> http://stut.net/
>

Stut you made my day! Thanks!

I tried the IMAP stuff with Mail.app and Thunderbird, but I didn't
really like it. It always seemed to hiccup and act slow randomly
which just got on my nerves. I still keep it around for when I need
to use GPG though.

On Jan 24, 2008 10:42 AM, Eric Butera <eric.butera@gmail.com> wrote:
> I used to be hardcore pop only but now that I use gmail I don't care
> about any other mail client. It beats Thunderbird and Mail.app hands
> down. If you don't look at the right hand side you won't see the ads.
> I even have it set up now to pull my pop mail account and slap it
> in a filter. Plus I enjoy all the people complaining about how users
> shouldn't change the subject. The gmail thread grouping takes care of
> all that for me. The only real downside is you can't view the raw
> source of messages or get the headers.

At the top-right of each message is a little downward-pointing
arrow (next to the Reply button). Click that, and then you click
"Show Original" to view all of the headers.

I actually don't see the same threading in Gmail. If a subject is
changed, for whatever reason, my Gmail sees it as a new thread - even
just with `Re:` appended to it. No clue why.

--
</Dan>

Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek and #1 Rated "Year's Coolest Guy" By Self Since
Nineteen-Seventy-[mumble].