| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Richard Maine" <nospam@see.signature> wrote in message news:1ibxju6.3wt1m7ga0zmmN%nospam@see.signature... > Quite a few ways exist. Pretty much all of them have "issues", depending > on the details of the needed usage. *THE* reference work on the question > is Moler's 1978 paper "Ninteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential > of a Matrix". I suggest just googling the phrase "Ninteen dubious ways". > Worked for me, including finding an update paper from 2003. Close. In point of fact, *THE* reference work is the 2003 survey paper by Moler & Loan, "Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-five Years Later", which includes a revision of the 1978 paper. Everling's algorithm in PL/I (ref. 50) is based on Liou's paper. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "robin" <robin_v@bigpond.com> wrote in message news:ZXeHj.3626$n8.358@news-server.bigpond.net.au... > Everling's algorithm in PL/I (ref. 50) is based on Liou's paper. I have transcribed this and edited it. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.