| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I have a main module doStuff.py and another module utility.py. At the start of doStuff.py I call import utility.py Then I also proceed to initiallize some global variables sName = "" Then I create a class, some methods etc. In one of the methods I assign a value to my variable sName. Then I call a function from within my utility.py file: utility.makeOne(stuff) Within my utility.py file, I define the makeOne function. But I want to use that same global variable "sName" In utility.py I have tried to indicate that I'm using the global "sName" through the statement: global sName But when I go to use the variable it still gives me an error: NameError: global name 'sName' is not defined I thought perhaps I need to indicate 'globality' in my main module, so before I initiallized sName in doStuff.py I added: global sName But it doesn't help me. I had this issue before and resolved it by declaring the variable global in the sub-module utility.py, but then I needed to reference it in my main module with a prefix: utility.sName = "" It's more verbose,and defining globals in a submodule seems backward. But also, what if I need to access "sName" in another imported module, say "otherstuff.py"? I would do my "import otherstuff" call in my main module, but would I have to put an "import utility" into the otherstuff.py file? Is there some way I can define globals in my main module, and have them accessible in all my imported submodule? As you can see I'm a little unsure about the global handling in a multi-module environment. Any suggestions appreciated. I've read http://docs.python.org/ref/naming.html but it hasn't enlightened me on this one. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| RgeeK wrote: > I have a main module doStuff.py and another module utility.py. At the > start of doStuff.py I call > > import utility.py that tries to import a module named "py" from the package "utility". > Then I also proceed to initiallize some global variables > > sName = "" > Within my utility.py file, I define the makeOne function. But I want to > use that same global variable "sName" In utility.py I have tried to > indicate that I'm using the global "sName" through the statement: > > global sName the "global" directive in Python is used *inside* a function or method to indicate that a given name is not local. Python doesn't have "program-wide global" variables; if you need that, create a support module and import that module everywhere you need to access those variables: # file: globalvars.py sName = "" # file: myprogram.py import globalvars print globalvars.sName etc. </F> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:21:03 -0400, RgeeK <Ross@no.thanks.spammers> declaimed the following in comp.lang.python: > I have a main module doStuff.py and another module utility.py. At the > start of doStuff.py I call > > import utility.py I hope not... import utility no .py > > Then I also proceed to initiallize some global variables > Python does not have global variables. Names belong within a module (or within functions defined within the module). > sName = "" > > Then I create a class, some methods etc. In one of the methods I assign > a value to my variable sName. Then I call a function from within > my utility.py file: > > utility.makeOne(stuff) > > > Within my utility.py file, I define the makeOne function. But I want to > use that same global variable "sName" In utility.py I have tried to > indicate that I'm using the global "sName" through the statement: > > global sName > The global statement is only used within functions (def blocks) to indicate that "writes" to the specified name are to modify the MODULE level version of the name, otherwise a write modifies a function local version of the name (you don't need global for read-only access of names, the search for names first looks inside the function, then out to the module) > But when I go to use the variable it still gives me an error: > > NameError: global name 'sName' is not defined > > I thought perhaps I need to indicate 'globality' in my main module, so > before I initiallized sName in doStuff.py I added: > > global sName > > But it doesn't help me. I had this issue before and resolved it by > declaring the variable global in the sub-module utility.py, but then I > needed to reference it in my main module with a prefix: > > utility.sName = "" > > It's more verbose,and defining globals in a submodule seems backward. > But also, what if I need to access "sName" in another imported module, > say "otherstuff.py"? I would do my "import otherstuff" call in my main > module, but would I have to put an "import utility" into the > otherstuff.py file? > If you really need "globals" the common solution is to create a module such as "myglobals", define all the shared names within that module, and import that module where ever you need access to one of the names. And yes, you will need to qualify all those names with the module name (though you can do things like: import myglobals as mg and then use mg.somename instead of myglobals.somename) -- Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber KD6MOG wlfraed@ix.netcom.com wulfraed@bestiaria.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/ (Bestiaria Support Staff: web-asst@bestiaria.com) HTTP://www.bestiaria.com/ |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Fredrik Lundh wrote: >> import utility.py > that tries to import a module named "py" from the package "utility". oops - that was just a typo in my post - I meant of course "import utility" > > Python doesn't have "program-wide global" variables; if you need that, > create a support module and import that module everywhere you need to > access those variables: > > # file: globalvars.py > sName = "" > > # file: myprogram.py > import globalvars > print globalvars.sName > > etc. > > </F> > That's news - thanks, I didn't realize that there just wasn't the concept of program-wide globals. The support module idea sounds like a path forward. -R. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Fredrik Lundh wrote: >> import utility.py > that tries to import a module named "py" from the package "utility". oops - that was just a typo in my post - I meant of course "import utility" > > Python doesn't have "program-wide global" variables; if you need that, > create a support module and import that module everywhere you need to > access those variables: > > # file: globalvars.py > sName = "" > > # file: myprogram.py > import globalvars > print globalvars.sName > > etc. > > </F> > That's news - thanks, I didn't realize that there just wasn't the concept of program-wide globals. The support module idea sounds like a path forward. -R. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:21:03 -0400, RgeeK <Ross@no.thanks.spammers> > declaimed the following in comp.lang.python: > >> I have a main module doStuff.py and another module utility.py. At the >> start of doStuff.py I call >> >> import utility.py > > I hope not... import utility no .py >> Then I also proceed to initiallize some global variables >> > Python does not have global variables. Names belong within a module > (or within functions defined within the module). > >> sName = "" >> >> Then I create a class, some methods etc. In one of the methods I assign >> a value to my variable sName. Then I call a function from within >> my utility.py file: >> >> utility.makeOne(stuff) >> >> >> Within my utility.py file, I define the makeOne function. But I want to >> use that same global variable "sName" In utility.py I have tried to >> indicate that I'm using the global "sName" through the statement: >> >> global sName >> > The global statement is only used within functions (def blocks) to > indicate that "writes" to the specified name are to modify the MODULE > level version of the name, otherwise a write modifies a function local > version of the name (you don't need global for read-only access of > names, the search for names first looks inside the function, then out to > the module) > >> But when I go to use the variable it still gives me an error: >> >> NameError: global name 'sName' is not defined >> >> I thought perhaps I need to indicate 'globality' in my main module, so >> before I initiallized sName in doStuff.py I added: >> >> global sName >> >> But it doesn't help me. I had this issue before and resolved it by >> declaring the variable global in the sub-module utility.py, but then I >> needed to reference it in my main module with a prefix: >> >> utility.sName = "" >> >> It's more verbose,and defining globals in a submodule seems backward. >> But also, what if I need to access "sName" in another imported module, >> say "otherstuff.py"? I would do my "import otherstuff" call in my main >> module, but would I have to put an "import utility" into the >> otherstuff.py file? >> > If you really need "globals" the common solution is to create a > module such as "myglobals", define all the shared names within that > module, and import that module where ever you need access to one of the > names. And yes, you will need to qualify all those names with the module > name (though you can do things like: > > import myglobals as mg > > and then use > > mg.somename > > instead of > > myglobals.somename) > Thanks for the reply. Good to see that approach has broad support ![]() I'll do that. I like the idea of a nice short alias for the import to keep the qualifications brief. Ross. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.