| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Is there a target date for a version of oorexx that will run on Windows Vista 64 bit OS? I have a new system which came with the Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS and I use rexx as my primary scripting language. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 22, 3:22*pm, geostr...@q.com wrote: > Is there a target date for a version of oorexx that will run on > Windows Vista 64 bit OS? *I have a new system which came with the > Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS and I use rexx as my primary scripting > language. We can't really give a target date, as there's still a lot of work still to go on the next release. On the other hand, about 10 minutes ago I got our first successful build on a 64-bit OS (Fedora 9, in this case). This is a huge milestone on the way make 64-bit releases available. Rick |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Rick McGuire wrote: > On Jul 22, 3:22 pm, geostr...@q.com wrote: > >>Is there a target date for a version of oorexx that will run on >>Windows Vista 64 bit OS? I have a new system which came with the >>Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS and I use rexx as my primary scripting >>language. > > > We can't really give a target date, as there's still a lot of work > still to go on the next release. On the other hand, about 10 minutes > ago I got our first successful build on a 64-bit OS (Fedora 9, in this > case). This is a huge milestone on the way make 64-bit releases > available. Curious. It should be possible to code more portably such that it shouldn't be much of a deal to port from 32 to 64 bits. I hope this is being considered in any redesign. > > Rick -- Gary Scott mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org -OR- Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done. -- Henry Ford |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| geostroud@q.com wrote: > Is there a target date for a version of oorexx that will run on > Windows Vista 64 bit OS? I have a new system which came with the > Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS and I use rexx as my primary scripting > language. The 32-bit one will run on the 64-bit Windows operating systems. There's a few relative obscure limitations, such as inability to look at 64-bit sections of the registry. Graham. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Gary Scott wrote: > Rick McGuire wrote: >> On Jul 22, 3:22 pm, geostr...@q.com wrote: >> >>> Is there a target date for a version of oorexx that will run on >>> Windows Vista 64 bit OS? I have a new system which came with the >>> Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS and I use rexx as my primary scripting >>> language. >> >> >> We can't really give a target date, as there's still a lot of work >> still to go on the next release. On the other hand, about 10 minutes >> ago I got our first successful build on a 64-bit OS (Fedora 9, in this >> case). This is a huge milestone on the way make 64-bit releases >> available. > > Curious. It should be possible to code more portably such that it > shouldn't be much of a deal to port from 32 to 64 bits. I hope this is > being considered in any redesign. > >> >> Rick > > That IS the purpose of lot of the the redesign. Rick |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Rick McGuire wrote: > Gary Scott wrote: > >> Rick McGuire wrote: >> >>> On Jul 22, 3:22 pm, geostr...@q.com wrote: >>> >>>> Is there a target date for a version of oorexx that will run on >>>> Windows Vista 64 bit OS? I have a new system which came with the >>>> Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS and I use rexx as my primary scripting >>>> language. >>> >>> >>> >>> We can't really give a target date, as there's still a lot of work >>> still to go on the next release. On the other hand, about 10 minutes >>> ago I got our first successful build on a 64-bit OS (Fedora 9, in this >>> case). This is a huge milestone on the way make 64-bit releases >>> available. >> >> >> Curious. It should be possible to code more portably such that it >> shouldn't be much of a deal to port from 32 to 64 bits. I hope this >> is being considered in any redesign. >> >>> >>> Rick >> >> >> > > That IS the purpose of lot of the the redesign. Great, then when 128-bit becomes the norm... ![]() > > Rick -- Gary Scott mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org -OR- Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done. -- Henry Ford |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Gary Scott wrote: > Rick McGuire wrote: > >> Gary Scott wrote: >> >>> Rick McGuire wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 22, 3:22 pm, geostr...@q.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there a target date for a version of oorexx that will run on >>>>> Windows Vista 64 bit OS? I have a new system which came with the >>>>> Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS and I use rexx as my primary scripting >>>>> language. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We can't really give a target date, as there's still a lot of work >>>> still to go on the next release. On the other hand, about 10 minutes >>>> ago I got our first successful build on a 64-bit OS (Fedora 9, in this >>>> case). This is a huge milestone on the way make 64-bit releases >>>> available. >>> >>> >>> Curious. It should be possible to code more portably such that it >>> shouldn't be much of a deal to port from 32 to 64 bits. I hope this >>> is being considered in any redesign. >>> >>>> >>>> Rick >>> >>> >>> >> >> That IS the purpose of lot of the the redesign. > > Great, then when 128-bit becomes the norm... ![]() ....I'll be retired, and it will be someone else's job :-) > >> >> Rick > > |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 23, 6:24 am, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gary Scott wrote: > > Great, then when 128-bit becomes the norm... ![]() > > ...I'll be retired, and it will be someone else's job :-) I'll have to do it. I'm too poor to ever retire. ;-) -- Mark Miesfeld |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 22, 12:22*pm, geostr...@q.com wrote: > Is there a target date for a version of oorexx that will run on > Windows Vista 64 bit OS? *I have a new system which came with the > Vista Home Premium 64 bit OS and I use rexx as my primary scripting > language. It looks like he isn't asking for a 64 bit version of ooRexx but wanted to know if it runs on Vista x64. I am running Vista X64 Business and ooRexx without any issues. Unless you run into the registry issues mentioned above, I don't see why you should have any problems. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Jul 23, 6:24 am, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Gary Scott wrote: > > >>>Great, then when 128-bit becomes the norm... ![]() >> >>...I'll be retired, and it will be someone else's job :-) > > > I'll have to do it. I'm too poor to ever retire. ;-) Just about everybody feels that way, no matter how much they make ![]() > > -- > Mark Miesfeld -- Gary Scott mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org -OR- Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done. -- Henry Ford |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.