Regex in Ruby question - RUBY

This is a discussion on Regex in Ruby question - RUBY ; Another newbie question: I've just started learning about regex "officially" (reading the O'reilly book) and was trying out some of the examples (porting them to Ruby from Perl). From what I can tell, Ruby's regex engine doesn't support "lookbehind", and ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Regex in Ruby question

  1. Default Regex in Ruby question

    Another newbie question:

    I've just started learning about regex "officially" (reading the
    O'reilly book) and was trying out some of the examples (porting them to
    Ruby from Perl). From what I can tell, Ruby's regex engine doesn't
    support "lookbehind", and as I had only a smattering of knowledge about
    regex before and no prior experience with lookaround, I was curious if
    this was significant.

    i.e. is there any problem that can't be solved without lookbehind?

    (Note that I am not facing such a problem; I'm just curious if
    lookbehind is just an optional feature that makes certain problems
    easier, as opposed to being an essential thing.)

    Thanks!
    --
    Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.


  2. Default Re: Regex in Ruby question

    > From what I can tell, Ruby's regex engine doesn't
    > support "lookbehind"


    Ruby 1.9 has look-behind:

    (?<=subexp) look-behind
    (?<!subexp) negative look-behind

    With ruby 1.8, you can install Oniguruma.

    Regards,
    Thomas.


  3. Default Re: Regex in Ruby question

    J. Cooper wrote:
    > i.e. is there any problem that can't be solved without lookbehind?


    Yes, there are. For example: you want to match any occurence of "bar" except
    if it is preceeded by "foo". I.e. you'd want to match "blabar" or "oofbar",
    but not "foobar". You can't do that without negative lookbehind.
    It might be interesting to note though, that any such problem could also not
    be solved by a regular grammar, so "regular" expressions that need lookbehind
    aren't, as such, regular anymore.

    HTH,
    Sebastian
    --
    Jabber: sepp2k@jabber.org
    ICQ: 205544826


  4. Default Re: Regex in Ruby question

    > Yes, there are. For example: you want to match any occurence of "bar" except
    > if it is preceeded by "foo". I.e. you'd want to match "blabar" or "oofbar",
    > but not "foobar".


    I think it's important to state that the look-behind matches with zero
    width, i.e. the match isn't included in the match.

    If it's okay to include the prefix in the match (e.g., in a gsub, the
    prefix could then be referenced as a group), this could also be
    achieved without lookbehind:

    require 'strscan'
    # 0 1 2 3
    # 0123456789012345678901234567890123
    s = StringScanner.new('blabar oofbar foobar ofobar offbar')
    # ^ ^ ^ ^
    until s.eos?
    m = s.scan_until(/([^o]|[^o]o|[^f]oo)(bar)/)
    p s.pos
    end

    # =>
    6
    13
    27
    34

    pos 20 is missing.

    There are of course situations when this isn't possible.

    Regards,
    Thomas.


  5. Default Re: Regex in Ruby question

    > However, with:
    > m = s.scan_until(/(([^o]|^)|([^o]|^)o|([^f]|^)oo)(bar)/)


    Oh well. It's probably a good thing we have look-behind now. :-)

    Regards,
    Thomas.

+ Reply to Thread