Re: Need help with sendmail / procmail - SendMail

This is a discussion on Re: Need help with sendmail / procmail - SendMail ; [ Added comp.mail.sendmail as recipient ] Garen Erdoisa <gerdoisa@cableone.net> writes in comp.mail.misc: > The envelope sender is normally put into the Return-Path: header. However > if the sender provides the Return-Path: header in the SMTP message body > during the ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Re: Need help with sendmail / procmail

  1. Default Re: Need help with sendmail / procmail

    [ Added comp.mail.sendmail as recipient ]

    Garen Erdoisa <gerdoisa@cableone.net> writes in comp.mail.misc:

    > The envelope sender is normally put into the Return-Path: header. However
    > if the sender provides the Return-Path: header in the SMTP message body
    > during the SMTP transaction, then sendmail will not overwrite it.


    Are you sure?

    $ fgrep -i Return-Path conf.c
    { "return-path", H_FORCE|H_ACHECK|H_BINDLATE, NULL },
    $

    / Kari Hurtta

  2. Default Re: Need help with sendmail / procmail

    In article <5dslddgnue.fsf@Hurtta06k.keh.iki.fi>, Kari Hurtta wrote:
    > [ Added comp.mail.sendmail as recipient ]
    >
    > Garen Erdoisa <gerdoisa@cableone.net> writes in comp.mail.misc:
    >
    >> The envelope sender is normally put into the Return-Path: header. However
    >> if the sender provides the Return-Path: header in the SMTP message body
    >> during the SMTP transaction, then sendmail will not overwrite it.

    >
    > Are you sure?


    It's something I've tested in the past (few years back) by telneting to my
    own SMTP server and submitting messages directly to the server to see how it
    reacted under various circumstances.

    Since you challenged the statement, I just tried duplicating this
    behavior again, and found that sendmail is replacing the return path
    header given in the SMTP message body DATA with the envelope sender data.
    So somewhere along the line that behavior changed. I stand corrected.

    Interesting...

    >
    > $ fgrep -i Return-Path conf.c
    > { "return-path", H_FORCE|H_ACHECK|H_BINDLATE, NULL },
    > $
    >


    --
    Garen

  3. Default Re: Need help with sendmail / procmail

    Garen Erdoisa <gerdoisa@cableone.net> writes:

    > In article <5dslddgnue.fsf@Hurtta06k.keh.iki.fi>, Kari Hurtta wrote:
    >> [ Added comp.mail.sendmail as recipient ]
    >>
    >> Garen Erdoisa <gerdoisa@cableone.net> writes in comp.mail.misc:
    >>
    >>> The envelope sender is normally put into the Return-Path: header. However
    >>> if the sender provides the Return-Path: header in the SMTP message body
    >>> during the SMTP transaction, then sendmail will not overwrite it.

    >>
    >> Are you sure?

    >
    > It's something I've tested in the past (few years back) by telneting to my
    > own SMTP server and submitting messages directly to the server to see how it
    > reacted under various circumstances.
    >
    > Since you challenged the statement, I just tried duplicating this
    > behavior again, and found that sendmail is replacing the return path
    > header given in the SMTP message body DATA with the envelope sender data.
    > So somewhere along the line that behavior changed. I stand corrected.
    >
    > Interesting...


    <quote src-file="RELEASE_NOTES">
    SENDMAIL RELEASE NOTES
    [...]
    8.2/8.2 1993/07/11
    [...]
    Fix problem that causes old Return-Path: line to override new
    Return-Path: line (conf.c needs H_FORCE to avoid
    re-using old value). From Motonori Nakamura.
    </quote>

    > [...]

    --
    [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@priv.onet.pl : anfi@xl.wp.pl
    Before You Ask: http://anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/B4UAsk-Sendmail.html
    http://anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/ [orkut,linkedin,xing]

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Sendmail, Procmail and (ugh) Exchange
    By Application Development in forum SendMail
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-30-2007, 09:48 AM
  2. Sendmail relay and procmail
    By Application Development in forum SendMail
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 03:11 AM
  3. Need help with sendmail / procmail
    By Application Development in forum SendMail
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-12-2007, 02:53 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-24-2007, 09:28 AM
  5. sendmail & procmail
    By Application Development in forum SendMail
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-21-2006, 03:27 PM