| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hello, playing around with sendmail's VRFY command I encountered the following: vrfy deleted-account@lex911.ru 051 lex911.ru: Name server timeout 050 deleted-account@lex911.ru... Transient parse error -- message queued for future delivery 252 2.1.5 <deleted-account@lex911.ru> Well, RFC2821 does not define 1st digit of code equal to zero at all. Sec 4.2 last sentence "Consequently, a sender-SMTP MUST be prepared to handle codes not specified in this document and MUST do so by interpreting the first digit only." Though, sec 4.2.1 does not define 0yz. I do like the extra information in 051, so I can skip the rest of processing, but is there a documentation about these extra replies somewhere? BTW: grepping the code, there is a single hit in sendmail v8.14.3: ../libsmutil/safefile.c: message("051 WARNING: %s writable directory %s", However, I use Debian's v8.13.8-3 Regards, |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <c815c2d4-d685-4cf8-8ec8-12612f0cd368@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> ska <skg@mail.inf.fh-brs.de> writes: >Hello, playing around with sendmail's VRFY command I encountered the >following: > >vrfy deleted-account@lex911.ru >051 lex911.ru: Name server timeout >050 deleted-account@lex911.ru... Transient parse error -- message >queued for future delivery >252 2.1.5 <deleted-account@lex911.ru> It seems you are running the daemon in debug mode (-dx.y, maybe -v will have this effect too). Don't do that on a production server - SMTP clients will be completely confused not just by the non-standard 0xx codes, but also by the fact that multiple responses are given for a single command. --Per Hedeland per@hedeland.org |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.