virtual domains and backscatter

In article <swxip9i778@patsy.huge.strangled.net>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:

>Have you conducted "step by step" installation tests provided in
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp....55531627df555d

Yes, I have. The mapping test passes. But the -bv test accepts
everything in the dovecot domains.

ellis@no.spam () wrote:

> In article <swxip9i778@patsy.huge.strangled.net>,
> Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
>
>>Have you conducted "step by step" installation tests provided in
>>http://groups.google.com/group/comp....55531627df555d
>
> Yes, I have. The mapping test passes. But the -bv test accepts
> everything in the dovecot domains.

1) Are you *SURE* you have patched cf/m4/proto.m4 file? ["step 5"]
2) Could you post you dovecot mailer definition?
echo '=M' | sendmail -bt | grep dovecot
Does it have "5" and "A" flags in its 'F=' section?

F=5 flag enables "post aliasing" processing by rule set 5 (localaddr).
It is required for the recipe to work.

--
[pl>en Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@onet.eu : anfi@xl.wp.pl
"World conquerors sometimes become fools,
but fools never become world conquerors."
-- "The Outer Limits: The Invisibles"

In article <omfuw3je78@sharon.anfi.chickenkiller.com>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:

>1) Are you *SURE* you have patched cf/m4/proto.m4 file? ["step 5"]

Yes, I'm sure. In fact I've been staring at the results quite
a bit

>2) Could you post you dovecot mailer definition?
> echo '=M' | sendmail -bt | grep dovecot

mailer 3 (dovecot): P=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromSMTP R=EnvToSMTP/HdrFromSMTP M=0 U=-1:-1 F=59ADFMPhnu L=0 E=\n T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix r=100 A=deliver -d $u

> Does it have "5" and "A" flags in its 'F=' section?

It didn't. But adding them didn't change anything.

>F=5 flag enables "post aliasing" processing by rule set 5 (localaddr).
>It is required for the recipe to work.

I was so hoping that would be it.

Rick <ellis@spinics.net> wrote:

> In article <omfuw3je78@sharon.anfi.chickenkiller.com>,
> Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
>
>>1) Are you *SURE* you have patched cf/m4/proto.m4 file? ["step 5"]
>
> Yes, I'm sure. In fact I've been staring at the results quite
> a bit
>
>>2) Could you post you dovecot mailer definition?
>> echo '=M' | sendmail -bt | grep dovecot
>
> mailer 3 (dovecot): P=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromSMTP R=EnvToSMTP/HdrFromSMTP M=0 U=-1:-1 F=59ADFMPhnu L=0 E=\n T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix r=100 A=deliver -d $u
>
>> Does it have "5" and "A" flags in its 'F=' section?
>
> It didn't. But adding them didn't change anything.
>
>>F=5 flag enables "post aliasing" processing by rule set 5 (localaddr).
>>It is required for the recipe to work.
>
> I was so hoping that would be it.

What is reported by test command below:

sendmail -C sendmail-test.cf -d21.12 -d60.5 -bv non-existing@dovecot.domain

-C sendmail.cf - use sendmail-test.cf instead of sendmail.cf
-d21.12 - trace processing of R lines in *.cf file
-d60.5 - trace map lookups

[ send the result via email to save c.m.sendmail bandwidth ]

--
[pl>en Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@onet.eu : anfi@xl.wp.pl
When I was in school, I cheated on my metaphysics exam: I looked into
the soul of the boy sitting next to me.
-- Woody Allen

Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:

> Rick <ellis@spinics.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <omfuw3je78@sharon.anfi.chickenkiller.com>,
>> Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
>>
>>>1) Are you *SURE* you have patched cf/m4/proto.m4 file? ["step 5"]
>>
>> Yes, I'm sure. In fact I've been staring at the results quite
>> a bit
>>
>>>2) Could you post you dovecot mailer definition?
>>> echo '=M' | sendmail -bt | grep dovecot
>>
>> mailer 3 (dovecot): P=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromSMTP R=EnvToSMTP/HdrFromSMTP M=0 U=-1:-1 F=59ADFMPhnu L=0 E=\n T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix r=100 A=deliver -d $u
>>
>>> Does it have "5" and "A" flags in its 'F=' section?
>>
>> It didn't. But adding them didn't change anything.
>>
>>>F=5 flag enables "post aliasing" processing by rule set 5 (localaddr).
>>>It is required for the recipe to work.
>>
>> I was so hoping that would be it.
>
> What is reported by test command below:
>
> sendmail -C sendmail-test.cf -d21.12 -d60.5 -bv non-existing@dovecot.domain
>
> -C sendmail.cf - use sendmail-test.cf instead of sendmail.cf
> -d21.12 - trace processing of R lines in *.cf file
> -d60.5 - trace map lookups
>
> [ send the result via email to save c.m.sendmail bandwidth ]

0) I have received the output via email

1) The domain have not been added to $={VDovecotDomains} list

*.mc file:
#v+
LOCAL_CONFIG
C{VDovecotDomains}dovecot.domain
#v-

P.S.
Domains listed in $={VDovecotDomains} are automatically added to $=w
(list of local email domains) so no "to:xxx" entry is required in access
table file.

--
[pl>en Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@onet.eu : anfi@xl.wp.pl
Everything in this book may be wrong.
-- Messiah's Handbook : Reminders for the Advanced Soul

In article <s7esaka378@lorenzo.anfi.chickenkiller.com>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:

>1) The domain have not been added to $={VDovecotDomains} list
>
>*.mc file:
>#v+
>LOCAL_CONFIG
>C{VDovecotDomains}dovecot.domain
>#v-

That's there and echo '$={VDovecotDomain}' | sendmail -bt shows
the domain.

ellis@no.spam () wrote:

> In article <s7esaka378@lorenzo.anfi.chickenkiller.com>,
> Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
>
>>1) The domain have not been added to $={VDovecotDomains} list
>>
>>*.mc file:
>>#v+
>>LOCAL_CONFIG
>>C{VDovecotDomains}dovecot.domain
>>#v-
>
> That's there and echo '$={VDovecotDomain}' | sendmail -bt shows
> the domain.

Debug output you emailed suggests otherwise
[ the real domain changed/munged into "dovecot.domain" for usenet post ]

rewrite: ruleset localaddr input: non-existing @ dovecot . domain
-----trying rule: $+
-----rule matches: $: $1 $| $> "Local_localaddr" $1
rewrite: ruleset Local_localaddr input: non-existing @ dovecot . domain
-----trying rule: $+ @ $={VDovecotDomains}
----- rule fails

According to the above "dovecot.domain" *IS NOT* listed in $={VDovecotDomains}

--
[pl>en Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@onet.eu : anfi@xl.wp.pl
"Boy, life takes a long time to live."
-- Steven Wright

In article <cnepmd5k78@lorenzo.anfi.chickenkiller.com>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:

>> That's there and echo '$={VDovecotDomain}' | sendmail -bt shows
>> the domain.

>Debug output you emailed suggests otherwise
>[ the real domain changed/munged into "dovecot.domain" for usenet post ]
>
>rewrite: ruleset localaddr input: non-existing @ dovecot . domain
>-----trying rule: $+
>-----rule matches: $: $1 $| $> "Local_localaddr" $1
>rewrite: ruleset Local_localaddr input: non-existing @ dovecot . domain
>-----trying rule: $+ @ $={VDovecotDomains}
>----- rule fails
>
>According to the above "dovecot.domain" *IS NOT* listed in $={VDovecotDomains}

Ok, this is what I have in the mc file (real domain changed):

FEATURE(`anfi/vdevcot_plain')
LOCAL_CONFIG
C{VDovecotDomain}dovecot.domain
divert(-1)

Rick wrote:
> In article <cnepmd5k78@lorenzo.anfi.chickenkiller.com>,
> Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
>
>>> That's there and echo '$={VDovecotDomain}' | sendmail -bt shows
>>> the domain.
>
>> Debug output you emailed suggests otherwise
>> [ the real domain changed/munged into "dovecot.domain" for usenet post ]
>>
>> rewrite: ruleset localaddr input: non-existing @ dovecot . domain
>> -----trying rule: $+
>> -----rule matches: $: $1 $| $> "Local_localaddr" $1
>> rewrite: ruleset Local_localaddr input: non-existing @ dovecot . domain
>> -----trying rule: $+ @ $={VDovecotDomains}
>> ----- rule fails
>>
>> According to the above "dovecot.domain" *IS NOT* listed in $={VDovecotDomains}
>
> Ok, this is what I have in the mc file (real domain changed):
>
> FEATURE(`anfi/vdevcot_plain')
> LOCAL_CONFIG
> C{VDovecotDomain}dovecot.domain
This line should read:
C{VDovecotDomains}dovecot.domain
> divert(-1)
>

Regards,

Kees.

--
Kees Theunissen.

In article <1220909198.882167@no.spam> Rick <ellis@spinics.net> writes:
>In article <cnepmd5k78@lorenzo.anfi.chickenkiller.com>,
>Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
>>
>>According to the above "dovecot.domain" *IS NOT* listed in $={VDovecotDomains}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------^

>Ok, this is what I have in the mc file (real domain changed):
>
>FEATURE(`anfi/vdevcot_plain')
>LOCAL_CONFIG
>C{VDovecotDomain}dovecot.domain
-----------------^

Watch your spelling...

--Per Hedeland
per@hedeland.org