Quantum Computation from Geometric Phase Around Loops in SpecialMatrix Spaces - Theory

This is a discussion on Quantum Computation from Geometric Phase Around Loops in SpecialMatrix Spaces - Theory ; D.R. Mitchell presented a clever way of solving the NP-complete 3-SAT problem by reducing it to determining the geometric (or Berry) phase acquired by a ground eigenvector transported about a loop in a specially structured, continuous, parameterized Hermitian matrix space(See ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Quantum Computation from Geometric Phase Around Loops in SpecialMatrix Spaces

  1. Default Quantum Computation from Geometric Phase Around Loops in SpecialMatrix Spaces

    D.R. Mitchell presented a clever way of solving the NP-complete 3-SAT
    problem by reducing it to determining the geometric (or Berry) phase
    acquired by a ground eigenvector transported about a loop in a
    specially structured, continuous, parameterized Hermitian matrix
    space(See [1].) Unfortunately, as the loop is traversed, the ground
    eigenvalue on the loop narrowly avoids collision with excited
    eigenvalues. At these points, the ground eigenvector must be
    transported "exponentially slowly" to avoid jumping and spoiling
    the computation - so only a polynomial speedup results.

    So I pose this general question:

    Are there matrix spaces where an eigenvalue gap condition
    can be enforced throughout the entire loop traversal?

    For example, most d-regular graphs are good expanders, i.e., the gap
    between the largest eigenvalue 'd' and the second largest eigenvalue
    of the the adjacency graph is large.

    One continuous ****og is the space of symmetric, doubly stochastic
    non-negative matrices.

    Can we transport the unique maximal/Perron eigenvector(eigenvalue 1)
    around loops in this space with the gap remaining large?

    Unless I am mistaken, quite general problems can be recast into
    this form, so I surmise that near collisions with the maximal/Perron
    eigenvalue are unavoidable, but I can't prove it.

    I would appreciate any help or suggestions.

    Thanks,
    Lou Pagnucco

    [1]"Geometric Phase Based Quantum Computation Applied to an
    NP-Complete Problem"
    http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/quant-p.../0508177v1.pdf



  2. Default Re: Quantum Computation from Geometric Phase Around Loops in SpecialMatrix Spaces

    I have to retract this question.

    The Perron eigenvector of doubly stochastic matrices is |1111...1> and
    fixed.

    Transporting it around a loop in the space of stochastic matrices will not
    result in anything but a zero geometric phase.

    "Lou Pagnucco" <pagnucco{}htdconnect.com> wrote in message
    news:131noepohvq1e0d{}corp.supernews.com...
    > D.R. Mitchell presented a clever way of solving the NP-complete 3-SAT
    > problem by reducing it to determining the geometric (or Berry) phase
    > [...]
    > I would appreciate any help or suggestions.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Lou Pagnucco
    >
    > [1]"Geometric Phase Based Quantum Computation Applied to an
    > NP-Complete Problem"
    > http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/quant-p.../0508177v1.pdf
    >
    >




+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. minimum phase system and phase
    By Application Development in forum DSP
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-21-2007, 12:21 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2007, 11:10 AM
  3. Quantum Computation By Adiabatic Evolution
    By Application Development in forum Theory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-07-2006, 04:25 PM
  4. Generalized Adiabatic Quantum Computation Without the Gap Condition
    By Application Development in forum Theory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-27-2006, 03:22 PM
  5. Conjecture about Complexity of a Quantum Computation Algorithm
    By Application Development in forum Theory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 12:10 AM