Re: The Computable Reals (alpha version)This is a discussion on Re: The Computable Reals (alpha version) within the Theory forums in Theory and Concepts category; On 2 Sep, 20:55, Virgil <Vir...@gmale.com> wrote: > In article > <181a29a1-b056-4ae2-b55d-a5b6be099...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > *ju...@diegidio.name wrote: > > > Now we are to the PLAIN NON SEQUITUR. > > > NOW WE ARE TO THE PURE TROLLING. > > Nice of you to admit it. Admit? Just F-U-C-K O-F-F. -LV... | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
09-02-2008, 04:05 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: The Computable Reals (alpha version) On 2 Sep, 20:55, Virgil <Vir...@gmale.com> wrote: > In article > <181a29a1-b056-4ae2-b55d-a5b6be099...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > *ju...@diegidio.name wrote: > > > Now we are to the PLAIN NON SEQUITUR. > > > NOW WE ARE TO THE PURE TROLLING. > > Nice of you to admit it. Admit? Just F-U-C-K O-F-F. -LV  |
|
#2
09-02-2008, 07:48 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: The Computable Reals (alpha version) In article <6637c787-ddf7-42bb-8156-fb4851f75e99@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, julio@diegidio.name wrote: > On 2 Sep, 20:55, Virgil <Vir...@gmale.com> wrote: > > In article > > <181a29a1-b056-4ae2-b55d-a5b6be099...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > > *ju...@diegidio.name wrote: > > > > > Now we are to the PLAIN NON SEQUITUR. > > > > > NOW WE ARE TO THE PURE TROLLING. > > > > Nice of you to admit it. > > Admit? Just F-U-C-K O-F-F. Note the sig of a loser! |
 |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.
