| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| An interesting (I think) exposition and side-by-side: Bhupinder Singh Anand "Can we express every transfinite concept constructively?" http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0305249 << In a forthcoming book, professional computer scientist and physicist Paul Budnik presents an exposition of classical mathematical theory as the backdrop to an elegant thesis: we can interpret any model of a formal system of Peano Arithmetic in an appropriate, digital, computational language. In this paper we attempt - without addressing the question of whether or not Budnik succeeds in establishing his thesis convincingly - to identify dogmas of standard interpretations of classical mathematical theory that appear to be implicit in Budnik’s exposition, and to correspond to them dogmas of a constructive interpretation of classical theory. >> -LV |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 2, 8:41*pm, ju...@diegidio.name wrote: > << In a forthcoming book, professional computer scientist and > physicist Paul > Budnik presents an exposition of classical mathematical theory as the > backdrop to an elegant thesis: we can interpret any model of a formal > system > of Peano Arithmetic in an appropriate, digital, computational > language. What does it mean to interpret a model? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.