Two dimensional formulas

On 21 Haziran 2007, 09:00, herbzet <herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> L.Kolukýsa wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > At October 15,2006, I had announced an unfinished study relating to
> > polynomial time
> > tautology checking in the group comp.theory. The main idea of the
> > study is to
> > convert a boolean formula into atwodimensionalform and then solve
> > the problem
> > using the properties of this form. It provides an algorithm at the
> > end. However, a
> > mistake has been found in the invalidity proof of this algorithm. Note
> > that this is
> > the only mistake found in the whole study. This means that if
> > algorithm says that a
> > formula is valid, it is indeed valid, but if it says a formula is
> > invalid, the
> > formula may be valid. There are some counter examples, where although
> > the formula is
> > valid, the algorithm can not find it. This is due to the fact that in
> > such formulas,
> > there are some arches whose order is the same with its reverse arc.
> > Although, this
> > can be corrected with some minor additions to the given algorithm, I
> > have developed
> > another algorithm which guarantess there are no such arches and much
> > simpler than
> > the previous one. Whenever, I ensure that it is correct and complete,
> > I put it to
> > the following address. The complete proof of it will come in a few
> > days. It also
> > contains a summary and some key points of the study. However, I have
> > not touched to
> > the original study yet.
>
> >http://www.geocities.com/lkoluk2003/
>
> > Lokman Kolukisa
>
> I haven't had time to look at this, but I am looking forward
> to reading it and the complete proof to come.
>
> > PS: Although the following may not relevant to the purposes of these
> > groups, I hope
> > the members will forgive me due to the abnormal conditions. I am under
> > attack for a
> > long time. This may explain why I announce the algorithm immediately.
> > As a result of
> > this attack, I have lost some of my intellectual abilities. This may
> > also explain,
> > why I have not touched the original study and why a correction comes
> > too late. I write this, because I think that announcing it is better
> > than not to announce it for me. Also I think that the source of the
> > attack is outside of my country(Turkey) because of the use of very
> > high technology.
>
> This postscript sounds like me when I was suffering from an attack
> of clinical paranoid psychosis.
>
> I wasn't sure who was watching me, but I thought it might be
> one or more of several national security agencies, or powerful
> private organizations.
>
> For lack of a better name, I called "them", the people watching
> me and trying to influence me, the Illuminati.
>
> I figured that I had probably come to their attention by mistake.
> I decided to just act normally, so eventually they'd get bored
> and go away.
>
> After a few months, the strong feelings of being watched faded
> out.
>
> Interestingly, I can go back into "paranoid mode" whenever
> I want, but it's a rather dreary exercise.
>
> If you are suffering from paranoia, you will logically suppose
> that this post may be part of the psychological attack on you.
> It isn't, but that's hard to prove, of course.
>
> If you think that you may be suffering from paranoia, I
> recommend that you relax, try not to worry, act normally,
> and let time go by.
>
> If you can afford _competent_ psychiatric help (which is hard
> to find), that might be worth a shot. Trust your feelings here.
>
> Good luck to you.
>
> --
> hz
> sci.logic subscriber- Alıntıyı gizle -
>
> - Alıntıyı göster -

It may be too late for an answer, however I will try. I know such a
response to my PS is almost standard. I think you give such a response
automatically, because (automatically I assume) you don't recognize me
and of course don't live around
me.

Now let investigate my situation.

Suppose you are in home and feel a strong heat seems to coming from a
wall where there is no stone. What do you think? There are two
alternatives: either you imagine this or it is real. Then you can
behave in various ways. If you think it is an imagine, then either
apply to a psiciatrist or worry about your situation but don't do
anything. If you think it is real, then you may tell this to others or
try to discover the origin of it or take any other action. However, a
real scientist behave differently in such a situation: before deciding
whether it is real or imagine, (s)he will try to prove whether this is
a real affect! One way of doing this is to use a thermometer. If the
thermometer shows different values among the places near the wall and
far from the wall, then you can trust that it is a real affect. Of
course, there is a probability there actually there is no difference
but you imagine such a difference! I.e. because you are a real
psychotic,you read the numbers different although they are the same.
However, usually people trust their eyes and beleive that they read
the numbers correctly. I am one of these people. After doing such an
experiment, and see the numbers different, then you may think how such
heat comes from the wall. If you know something about
electromagnetism, then you can set up an hypothesis that this is a
microwave beam directed(may be accidently) to the place where you are
sitting. Again one way of proving this hypothesis is to place some
sheets made with various materials between you and the wall . Assume
you use a sheet of paper and discover that the feeling of heat is the
same. Then use a sheet of aliminium and discover that the feeling of
heat reduced. A better way is to use a thermometer and discover that
behind the sheet of aliminium , the temperature drops. After doing all
of things, you may again can reach two conclusion: either you imagine
all of these things or it is real depends on your ideology. I know
idealizm is one of the ideology which argues that everything around is
created by our mind. I am not an idealist.

Let there are may be hundreds of events similar to this and each one
of this can be measured, seen or dedected by some devices and even you
can see some people while doing something which seems to the source
of these affects. I must note here that the very high technology I
had mentioned is not the microwave technology, but related to the
biology. Then what will you decide? you may decide that they are
true or I am lying or I am a psyhotic or doubt about your decision.
From your response, I deduce you are not a scientific minded person,
because you had decided immediately that I suffer from clinic paranoid
psychosis without knowing anything about me and how I live. I advise
you to not decide anything before know something about it.

Lokman Kolukisa

L.Kolukýsa wrote:
> On 21 Haziran 2007, 09:00, herbzet <herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > L.Kolukýsa wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > At October 15,2006, I had announced an unfinished study relating to
> > > polynomial time
> > > tautology checking in the group comp.theory. The main idea of the
> > > study is to
> > > convert a boolean formula into atwodimensionalform and then solve
> > > the problem
> > > using the properties of this form. It provides an algorithm at the
> > > end. However, a
> > > mistake has been found in the invalidity proof of this algorithm. Note
> > > that this is
> > > the only mistake found in the whole study. This means that if
> > > algorithm says that a
> > > formula is valid, it is indeed valid, but if it says a formula is
> > > invalid, the
> > > formula may be valid. There are some counter examples, where although
> > > the formula is
> > > valid, the algorithm can not find it. This is due to the fact that in
> > > such formulas,
> > > there are some arches whose order is the same with its reverse arc.
> > > Although, this
> > > can be corrected with some minor additions to the given algorithm, I
> > > have developed
> > > another algorithm which guarantess there are no such arches and much
> > > simpler than
> > > the previous one. Whenever, I ensure that it is correct and complete,
> > > I put it to
> > > the following address. The complete proof of it will come in a few
> > > days. It also
> > > contains a summary and some key points of the study. However, I have
> > > not touched to
> > > the original study yet.
> >
> > >http://www.geocities.com/lkoluk2003/
> >
> > > Lokman Kolukisa
> >
> > I haven't had time to look at this, but I am looking forward
> > to reading it and the complete proof to come.
> >
> > > PS: Although the following may not relevant to the purposes of these
> > > groups, I hope
> > > the members will forgive me due to the abnormal conditions. I am under
> > > attack for a
> > > long time. This may explain why I announce the algorithm immediately.
> > > As a result of
> > > this attack, I have lost some of my intellectual abilities. This may
> > > also explain,
> > > why I have not touched the original study and why a correction comes
> > > too late. I write this, because I think that announcing it is better
> > > than not to announce it for me. Also I think that the source of the
> > > attack is outside of my country(Turkey) because of the use of very
> > > high technology.
> >
> > This postscript sounds like me when I was suffering from an attack
> > of clinical paranoid psychosis.
> >
> > I wasn't sure who was watching me, but I thought it might be
> > one or more of several national security agencies, or powerful
> > private organizations.
> >
> > For lack of a better name, I called "them", the people watching
> > me and trying to influence me, the Illuminati.
> >
> > I figured that I had probably come to their attention by mistake.
> > I decided to just act normally, so eventually they'd get bored
> > and go away.
> >
> > After a few months, the strong feelings of being watched faded
> > out.
> >
> > Interestingly, I can go back into "paranoid mode" whenever
> > I want, but it's a rather dreary exercise.
> >
> > If you are suffering from paranoia, you will logically suppose
> > that this post may be part of the psychological attack on you.
> > It isn't, but that's hard to prove, of course.
> >
> > If you think that you may be suffering from paranoia, I
> > recommend that you relax, try not to worry, act normally,
> > and let time go by.
> >
> > If you can afford _competent_ psychiatric help (which is hard
> > to find), that might be worth a shot. Trust your feelings here.
> >
> > Good luck to you.
> >
> > --
> > hz
> > sci.logic subscriber- Alıntıyı gizle -
> >
> > - Alıntıyı göster -
>
> It may be too late for an answer, however I will try. I know such a
> response to my PS is almost standard. I think you give such a response
> automatically, because (automatically I assume) you don't recognize me
> and of course don't live around
> me.
>
> Now let investigate my situation.
>
> Suppose you are in home and feel a strong heat seems to coming from a
> wall where there is no stone. What do you think? There are two
> alternatives: either you imagine this or it is real. Then you can
> behave in various ways. If you think it is an imagine, then either
> apply to a psiciatrist or worry about your situation but don't do
> anything. If you think it is real, then you may tell this to others or
> try to discover the origin of it or take any other action. However, a
> real scientist behave differently in such a situation: before deciding
> whether it is real or imagine, (s)he will try to prove whether this is
> a real affect! One way of doing this is to use a thermometer. If the
> thermometer shows different values among the places near the wall and
> far from the wall, then you can trust that it is a real affect. Of
> course, there is a probability there actually there is no difference
> but you imagine such a difference! I.e. because you are a real
> psychotic,you read the numbers different although they are the same.
> However, usually people trust their eyes and beleive that they read
> the numbers correctly. I am one of these people. After doing such an
> experiment, and see the numbers different, then you may think how such
> heat comes from the wall. If you know something about
> electromagnetism, then you can set up an hypothesis that this is a
> microwave beam directed(may be accidently) to the place where you are
> sitting. Again one way of proving this hypothesis is to place some
> sheets made with various materials between you and the wall . Assume
> you use a sheet of paper and discover that the feeling of heat is the
> same. Then use a sheet of aliminium and discover that the feeling of
> heat reduced. A better way is to use a thermometer and discover that
> behind the sheet of aliminium , the temperature drops. After doing all
> of things, you may again can reach two conclusion: either you imagine
> all of these things or it is real depends on your ideology. I know
> idealizm is one of the ideology which argues that everything around is
> created by our mind. I am not an idealist.
>
> Let there are may be hundreds of events similar to this and each one
> of this can be measured, seen or dedected by some devices and even you
> can see some people while doing something which seems to the source
> of these affects. I must note here that the very high technology I
> had mentioned is not the microwave technology, but related to the
> biology. Then what will you decide? you may decide that they are
> true or I am lying or I am a psyhotic or doubt about your decision.
> From your response, I deduce you are not a scientific minded person,
> because you had decided immediately that I suffer from clinic paranoid
> psychosis without knowing anything about me and how I live. I advise
> you to not decide anything before know something about it.

That's good advice in any case.

I don't think I really made a judgement of you, I just said
that it sounded like me at one point in my life. As you
say, I can't really tell for sure from a distance and
not knowing anything about you or your circumstances.

If you are under an attack that is debilitating your
intellectual faculties, it might be well to consult
a neurologist for treatment of your injuries.

There is always the possibility of a somatic disorder,
whether from an attack, or in addition to and independent
from an attack.

I am not in a position to offer you medical attention
or police protection, but I wish you well. Good luck.

Feel free to email me if you like.

--
hz