Another approach to decide on real root existence for univariatePolynomials, and a multivariate extension for 3-SAT

This is a discussion on Another approach to decide on real root existence for univariatePolynomials, and a multivariate extension for 3-SAT within the Theory forums in Theory and Concepts category; Hi, I request your expert reviews & comments on my paper available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0018 Thanks, -Deepak Ponvel Chermakani...

Go Back   Application Development Forum > Theory and Concepts > Theory

Object Mix

Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:31 AM
deepakc
Guest
 
Default Another approach to decide on real root existence for univariatePolynomials, and a multivariate extension for 3-SAT

Hi,

I request your expert reviews & comments on my paper available at
http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0018

Thanks,
-Deepak Ponvel Chermakani
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-18-2008, 01:15 PM
deepakc
Guest
 
Default Re: Another approach to decide on real root existence for univariatePolynomials, and a multivariate extension for 3-SAT

I discovered a repairable error in the explanation of my proof of
Lemma-7.1 of my arXiv:0803.0018v5 paper. I say that this error is
repairable because the Lemma-7.1 (and Theorem-7) continues to remain
correct.

On page 7 of my paper, please look at the 6th and 7th line from top,
where I define Fk = Pk / (1+SUMMATION((Xi/LAMBDA)^Z, over all i as
integers in [2,u])) + 1 / (1+SUMMATION((LAMBDA/Xi)^Z, over all i as
integers in [2,u])). As you can see, the current definition of Fk
evaluates to Pk within the region S, and evaluates to 1 if all Xi >
LAMBDA, but can evaluate to 0 outside the region S if some Xi > LAMBDA
and other Xi < LAMBDA.

However, what we want is that Fk must evaluate to Pk within region S,
and must evaluate to 1 outside S.

So, the current definition of Fk can be easily repaired as follows. Fk
= Pk / (1+SUMMATION((Xi/LAMBDA)^Z, over all i as integers in [2,u])) +
SUMMATION((Xi/LAMBDA)^Z, over all i as integers in [2,u]) /
(1+SUMMATION((Xi/LAMBDA)^Z, over all i as integers in [2,u])).

So Fk can continue to be expressed as some num_i/den_i, and therefore,
Theorem-7 continues to remain correct.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2008, 09:29 AM
deepakc
Guest
 
Default Re: Another approach to decide on real root existence for univariatePolynomials, and a multivariate extension for 3-SAT

Respected Professors and Mathematicians,

I hope you are all doing well.

I am longing to hear more comments from you, regarding my arXiv:
0803.0018v5 paper. I hope you will be able to spare precious time from
your busy schedules, and offer me your valued comments or suggestions
on how to improve my paper.

I intend to submit and present my arXiv:0803.0018v5 paper at some
conference/seminar in the USA. I intend to personally attend that
conference, and meet respected mathematicians like you (and hopefully
you), and learn more from you by directly interacting face-to-face.

I shall be grateful if you could suggest to me, which conference/
seminar is suitable for my paper, so that I may submit there.

I look forward to your replies either via email, or via my below
mentioned Public Thread.

Thanks & faithfully,
-Deepak
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.