Is there a group fro System Verilog

This is a discussion on Is there a group fro System Verilog within the verilog forums in Programming Languages category; or we just follow this one...

Go Back   Application Development Forum > Programming Languages > verilog

Object Mix

Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1  
Old 07-30-2008, 07:31 AM
parag_paul@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Default Is there a group fro System Verilog

or we just follow this one
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-30-2008, 01:06 PM
Robert Miles
Guest
 
Default Re: Is there a group fro System Verilog


<parag_paul@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4926bb48-067b-48d7-a82e-5f58c607c2d3@h17g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> or we just follow this one


I checked the newsgroups available on the three newsgroups servers
I use, and the only other newsgroup with verilog in the name on any
of them is fj.comp.lang.verilog . I'm unable to find anything at all
posted to it, though, and the first part of its name suggests that it uses
a language other than English.

So if there's any other group, it's unlikely to be a newsgroup.

I often see System Verilog mentioned in the comp.lang.verilog
newsgroup, though.



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-31-2008, 12:28 AM
googler
Guest
 
Default Re: Is there a group fro System Verilog

On Jul 30, 6:31*am, "parag_p...@hotmail.com" <parag_p...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> *or we just follow this one


I think you will find more SystemVerilog users and related topics at
the website http://verificationguild.com/ . This site has forums where
you can ask questions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-03-2008, 11:15 AM
Jonathan Bromley
Guest
 
Default Re: Is there a group fro System Verilog

Parag,

"googler" already mentioned Verification Guild, but
the main concern there is verification methodology
and SystemVerilog is a secondary issue.

I believe that comp.lang.verilog should be, and
will be, the right place for general discussion
of SystemVerilog topics as SV becomes more widely
used. Already you can use SV design constructs
in most of the major tools without any difficulty;
SV verification (classes, coverage, assertions)
is likely to require extra licence features in
the simulator, but it's still a part of Verilog.
In particular, the IEEE-1364 Verilog standard
will soon disappear altogether, and will become
a subset of IEEE-1800 SystemVerilog when the
next revision is published (probably mid-2009,
although that's still not certain right now).

If your major focus is verification, you should
also make use of www.vmmcentral.org and
www.ovmworld.org. Both are highly active, but
of course each has a specific verification
toolkit as its main concern.

Finally don't overlook www.svug.org, the SV
user group website; it's been a little quiet
for the last six months after a vigorous start
last year, but it's about to be kick-started
again with a fresh round of live meetings and
some new focus to the discussion forums.

All these different groups have different
areas of concern, but the usual suspects tend
to hang out on all of them to a greater or lesser
extent, so they should all provide some value
to you.
--
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant

DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services

Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK
jonathan.bromley@MYCOMPANY.com
http://www.MYCOMPANY.com

The contents of this message may contain personal views which
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2008, 12:39 AM
parag_paul@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Default Re: Is there a group fro System Verilog

On Aug 3, 8:15*pm, Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.brom...@MYCOMPANY.com>
wrote:
> Parag,
>
> "googler" already mentioned Verification Guild, but
> the main concern there is verification methodology
> and SystemVerilog is a secondary issue.
>
> I believe that comp.lang.verilog should be, and
> will be, the right place for general discussion
> of SystemVerilog topics as SV becomes more widely
> used. *Already you can use SV design constructs
> in most of the major tools without any difficulty;
> SV verification (classes, coverage, assertions)
> is likely to require extra licence features in
> the simulator, but it's still a part of Verilog.
> In particular, the IEEE-1364 Verilog standard
> will soon disappear altogether, and will become
> a subset of IEEE-1800 SystemVerilog when the
> next revision is published (probably mid-2009,
> although that's still not certain right now).
>
> If your major focus is verification, you should
> also make use ofwww.vmmcentral.organdwww.ovmworld.org. *Both are highlyactive, but
> of course each has a specific verification
> toolkit as its main concern.
>
> Finally don't overlookwww.svug.org, the SV
> user group website; it's been a little quiet
> for the last six months after a vigorous start
> last year, but it's about to be kick-started
> again with a fresh round of live meetings and
> some new focus to the discussion forums.
>
> All these different groups have different
> areas of concern, but the usual suspects tend
> to hang out on all of them to a greater or lesser
> extent, so they should all provide some value
> to you.
> --
> Jonathan Bromley, Consultant
>
> DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
> VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services
>
> Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK
> jonathan.brom...@MYCOMPANY.comhttp://www.MYCOMPANY.com
>
> The contents of this message may contain personal views which
> are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.


Thank you Jonathan.
That helps. I just wanted to know if there was something else going on
elsewhere since this has been a quieter place since long
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.