| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| or we just follow this one |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| <parag_paul@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4926bb48-067b-48d7-a82e-5f58c607c2d3@h17g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > or we just follow this one I checked the newsgroups available on the three newsgroups servers I use, and the only other newsgroup with verilog in the name on any of them is fj.comp.lang.verilog . I'm unable to find anything at all posted to it, though, and the first part of its name suggests that it uses a language other than English. So if there's any other group, it's unlikely to be a newsgroup. I often see System Verilog mentioned in the comp.lang.verilog newsgroup, though. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 30, 6:31*am, "parag_p...@hotmail.com" <parag_p...@hotmail.com> wrote: > *or we just follow this one I think you will find more SystemVerilog users and related topics at the website http://verificationguild.com/ . This site has forums where you can ask questions. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Parag, "googler" already mentioned Verification Guild, but the main concern there is verification methodology and SystemVerilog is a secondary issue. I believe that comp.lang.verilog should be, and will be, the right place for general discussion of SystemVerilog topics as SV becomes more widely used. Already you can use SV design constructs in most of the major tools without any difficulty; SV verification (classes, coverage, assertions) is likely to require extra licence features in the simulator, but it's still a part of Verilog. In particular, the IEEE-1364 Verilog standard will soon disappear altogether, and will become a subset of IEEE-1800 SystemVerilog when the next revision is published (probably mid-2009, although that's still not certain right now). If your major focus is verification, you should also make use of www.vmmcentral.org and www.ovmworld.org. Both are highly active, but of course each has a specific verification toolkit as its main concern. Finally don't overlook www.svug.org, the SV user group website; it's been a little quiet for the last six months after a vigorous start last year, but it's about to be kick-started again with a fresh round of live meetings and some new focus to the discussion forums. All these different groups have different areas of concern, but the usual suspects tend to hang out on all of them to a greater or lesser extent, so they should all provide some value to you. -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK jonathan.bromley@MYCOMPANY.com http://www.MYCOMPANY.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Aug 3, 8:15*pm, Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.brom...@MYCOMPANY.com> wrote: > Parag, > > "googler" already mentioned Verification Guild, but > the main concern there is verification methodology > and SystemVerilog is a secondary issue. > > I believe that comp.lang.verilog should be, and > will be, the right place for general discussion > of SystemVerilog topics as SV becomes more widely > used. *Already you can use SV design constructs > in most of the major tools without any difficulty; > SV verification (classes, coverage, assertions) > is likely to require extra licence features in > the simulator, but it's still a part of Verilog. > In particular, the IEEE-1364 Verilog standard > will soon disappear altogether, and will become > a subset of IEEE-1800 SystemVerilog when the > next revision is published (probably mid-2009, > although that's still not certain right now). > > If your major focus is verification, you should > also make use ofwww.vmmcentral.organdwww.ovmworld.org. *Both are highlyactive, but > of course each has a specific verification > toolkit as its main concern. > > Finally don't overlookwww.svug.org, the SV > user group website; it's been a little quiet > for the last six months after a vigorous start > last year, but it's about to be kick-started > again with a fresh round of live meetings and > some new focus to the discussion forums. > > All these different groups have different > areas of concern, but the usual suspects tend > to hang out on all of them to a greater or lesser > extent, so they should all provide some value > to you. > -- > Jonathan Bromley, Consultant > > DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how > VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services > > Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK > jonathan.brom...@MYCOMPANY.comhttp://www.MYCOMPANY.com > > The contents of this message may contain personal views which > are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. Thank you Jonathan. That helps. I just wanted to know if there was something else going on elsewhere since this has been a quieter place since long |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
In an effort to better serve ads to our visitors, cookies are used on objectmix.com. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.