Rich Salz wrote:
>>It's indeed a small world. I think we are working on the same issue with the
> We are.
> Thanks for the detailed summary. Whew!
Rich, I posted a message <news:4027B40A.firstname.lastname@example.org> that
shows the xmlsec implementation does not validate the sample Guangxi
Can you check if this is due to a difference in the result of the c14n
normalisation of the SignedInfo node for xmlsec and what the XS40 XML
gateway gives ?